Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Honorable Leningrad Elarionoff, Chair <br /> and Members of the Committee on Planning <br /> COUNTY COUNCIL <br /> Page 4 <br /> December 15, 2003 <br /> density in Honaunau (H-5), and the "Hawaiian Riviera" project (I-3). In the same <br /> vein, there is the proposed "Conservation" area at Keopuka and around <br /> Kealakekua Bay, H-1. <br /> While we will have growth and development on the island, and the General Plan <br /> allows for that, we must also preserve coastal open space and viewplanes, and <br /> recreational areas and sites of cultural importance, long-term. This is the main <br /> reason for these proposed changes. <br /> There is naturally concern about the potential economic effect of changes like <br /> these. Unless we actively protect open space and environmental quality, we will <br /> lose the things that lure visitors and new residents. More directly, for at least the <br /> next ten years, and probably well beyond, projected increases in visitor amvals <br /> can easily be absorbed in hotel rooms that currently go vacant, and in the <br /> additional inventory that will come from the renovation of the Kona Surf, and <br /> various timeshare and smaller hotel projects that are currently moving forward. <br /> Hotel occupancy rates on the island have long lagged behind the state average. <br /> There is a general trend that more visitors are being accommodated in timeshares, <br /> B&B's, vacation rentals, and on cruise ships. <br /> At the same time, the proposed LUPAG map changes will simplify land use <br /> approvals within the existing major resort areas, which are being changed from a <br /> mix of uses to a "resort node" LUPAG map category. <br /> Although the landowners can speak for themselves, it is my understanding that <br /> the Kohanaiki, Keopuka, and Honaunau landowners do not object to these <br /> proposed LUPAG map amendments. <br /> The deletion of the "Hawaiian Riviera" is also meant to restore some credibility to <br /> the LUPAG maps. The landowner has done nothing in the last few years to get the <br /> remaining entitlements it needs to develop the project. The concept upon which <br /> the General Plan "major resort" designation was granted in the late 1980's is not <br /> viable. <br /> <br />