My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0045.025 2002-2004
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2002-2004
>
COM 0045.025 2002-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2019 2:09:59 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 12:29:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2002-2004
Communication
0045
Point
025
Author
Christopher J. Yuen, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
PC - Closed file - 1/4/05 Presented: PC - 12/18/03
Document Relationships
AGE PC 01/04/2005 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 163 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
COM 0045.000 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Honorable Leningrad Elarionoff, Chair <br /> and Members of the Committee on Planning <br /> COUNTY COUNCIL <br /> Page 7 <br /> December 15, 2003 <br /> enacted, the mapping and ratification process would probably take a couple of <br /> years. <br /> This is too long for the county to delay action on the General Plan to wait to see <br /> what happens with IAL's on the state level. <br /> 4. Length of the General Plan <br /> Some councilmembers have commented about the length of the draft General <br /> Plan. It is not much longer than the current General Plan, but perhaps this is not a <br /> sufficient justification. <br /> It would be possible to significantly reduce the length of the General Plan by <br /> separating out the material that really needs to be part of the Plan and enacted by <br /> ordinance, from text that is primarily descriptive. Only part of the General Plan <br /> text must have the force and effect of law: primarily the goals, policies, standards, <br /> and courses of action, the LUPAG maps, facilities, and roadways maps, the lists <br /> of areas of natural beauty and protected historic sites, and the general policy <br /> materials in the Land Use and Plan Implementation sections. The district profiles, <br /> tables of information about housing units, historical materials about population <br /> and visitor arrivals, while useful, do not have to be enacted by ordinance. <br /> The current 1989 General Plan is basically organized in a way that separates out <br /> the goals, policies, standards, and courses of action, with the remaining material <br /> in a "Support Document", but both parts were enacted by ordinance and printed <br /> together. <br /> Reorganized this way, the General Plan could probably be reduced to about half <br /> of its present size. The other descriptive material is important, and could be a <br /> supplement to the General Plan, but printed in a separate binder. <br /> There is no other way to substantially reduce the size of the General Plan without <br /> completely rewriting it. <br /> The reorganization of the General Plan would have to be carefully done so that <br /> the important policies remained part of the adopted plan. Some of the <br /> "descriptive" material is important to provide a context for the rest of the plan. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.