Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Honorable Leningrad Elarionoff, Chair <br /> and Members of the Committee on Planning <br /> COUNTY COUNCIL <br /> Page 7 <br /> December 15, 2003 <br /> enacted, the mapping and ratification process would probably take a couple of <br /> years. <br /> This is too long for the county to delay action on the General Plan to wait to see <br /> what happens with IAL's on the state level. <br /> 4. Length of the General Plan <br /> Some councilmembers have commented about the length of the draft General <br /> Plan. It is not much longer than the current General Plan, but perhaps this is not a <br /> sufficient justification. <br /> It would be possible to significantly reduce the length of the General Plan by <br /> separating out the material that really needs to be part of the Plan and enacted by <br /> ordinance, from text that is primarily descriptive. Only part of the General Plan <br /> text must have the force and effect of law: primarily the goals, policies, standards, <br /> and courses of action, the LUPAG maps, facilities, and roadways maps, the lists <br /> of areas of natural beauty and protected historic sites, and the general policy <br /> materials in the Land Use and Plan Implementation sections. The district profiles, <br /> tables of information about housing units, historical materials about population <br /> and visitor arrivals, while useful, do not have to be enacted by ordinance. <br /> The current 1989 General Plan is basically organized in a way that separates out <br /> the goals, policies, standards, and courses of action, with the remaining material <br /> in a "Support Document", but both parts were enacted by ordinance and printed <br /> together. <br /> Reorganized this way, the General Plan could probably be reduced to about half <br /> of its present size. The other descriptive material is important, and could be a <br /> supplement to the General Plan, but printed in a separate binder. <br /> There is no other way to substantially reduce the size of the General Plan without <br /> completely rewriting it. <br /> The reorganization of the General Plan would have to be carefully done so that <br /> the important policies remained part of the adopted plan. Some of the <br /> "descriptive" material is important to provide a context for the rest of the plan. <br /> <br />