My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0045.024 2002-2004
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2002-2004
>
COM 0045.024 2002-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2019 2:09:59 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 12:29:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2002-2004
Communication
0045
Point
024
Author
John Ray, President Hawai‘i Leeward Planning Conference
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
PC - Closed file - 1/4/05 Presented: PC - 12/18/03
Document Relationships
AGE PC 01/04/2005 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 163 Draft 01 2000-2002
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2000-2002
COM 0045.000 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rural District <br /> In general, we believe the County should utilize the rural district to a greater degree in General <br /> Plan designations. At the State level I believe the intent is to make the rural district more "user <br /> friendly" to agriculture with right to farm legislation, etc. It's important to understand that <br /> property taxes will not rise if Ag use (dedication) continues on rural classified lands. The County <br /> has the mapping capability to overlay all existing 1-3 acre Ag subdivisions on the General Plan <br /> maps. We strongly support reclassifying all of these lands as County General Plan Rural, <br /> maintainin the current zonin~densi~. Please request the Planning Department to prepare <br /> these maps as a point of discussion. <br /> Ag Workin~c Group <br /> The attached Standards and Cntena - Ag Working Group Recommendations will give you a <br /> sense of the discussion taking place at the State level. This is, a work in pro ress and on>~ a <br /> draft at this point. I also included comments from Bob Wagner with the American Farmland <br /> Trust who reviewed and commented on the draft Standards and Criteria. The Ag Working Group <br /> website has a lot of useful information: htt~://ctahr.hawaii,edu/ctahr200~ww~ <br /> Plan Sim lification <br /> We support Council Chair Elarionoff's suggestion of separating the current text (supporting <br /> material) from the ordinance to create a more simplified document. The current text is <br /> outdated, often inconsistent in the depth of treatment between districts, and would require a <br /> major effort to revisit and revise. We believe concentrating on community development plans to <br /> implement more detailed and comprehensive planning in the future would be a better use of <br /> County resources. <br /> Additional Research <br /> We have also helped support a review of the General Plan by Professor David Callles who will <br /> submit his comments directly to the County. At this point we take no position on these <br /> comments other than to regard them as helpful input for consideration. <br /> <br /> Thank you for the opportunity [o comments and we look forward to working with you on this <br /> important task. <br /> Regards, <br /> ~`a ~ <br /> <br /> John B. Ray <br /> President <br /> Hawaii Leeward Planning Conference <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.