Laserfiche WebLink
Pclcific, ~t1c. 100 Pauahi Street, Suite 212 <br /> Hi10,. HI 96720-3046 <br /> MEMORANDUM: R~r: ~d9.t161-2776 <br /> Fax: 808-935-5934 <br /> www. m-e.com <br /> TO: Sidney Fuke <br /> FROM: Harold Sugiyama ~j <br /> DATE: March 8, 2004 <br /> SUBJECT: Clifto's LLC Project -Traffic Study <br /> We have the following response to Christopher Yuen's letter of February 4, 2004. <br /> We have analyzed signalized intersections rather than highway operations for two <br /> reasons. First, traffic signals have a more adverse impact on highway operations that just <br /> traffic volumes and become the constraining point along the roadway. Second, the <br /> highway analysis assumes that there are no traffic signals along the analysis route. Also, <br /> the levels of service for signalized intersections are not necessarily comparable with the <br /> highway level of service since they represent different concepts of operations. The levels <br /> of service for signalized intersections aze based on average delay while the levels of <br /> service for two lane highway operations are based on the percent time spent following <br /> other vehicles and average travel speeds. Level of service D for a Class 1 two lane <br /> highway like Queen Kaahumanu Highway is defined as percent time following of 65- <br /> 80%and average travel speeds of 40 to 45 miles per hour. The average speed at level of <br /> service D is still considered to be desirable. <br /> The computer program used to analyze level of service for signalized intersections <br /> assumes that there is no traffic backup from the adjacent intersections or other highway <br /> operations. At the time of our traffic counts in October 2002, there were no traffic <br /> backups from either of the two study intersections (Hina Lani Drive and Kaiminani <br /> Drive) into the other. Also, there was no traffic queue from Kailua town. Therefore, the <br /> signalized intersection level of service analysis was appropriate to use and the results <br /> matched the traffic operations that were observed. <br /> We calculated the two lane highway level of service using the existing traffic volumes <br /> shown in our report. We calculated level of service D for both morning and afternoon <br /> peak hours, which coincides with the referenced study's assessment. Again, as noted <br /> above, level of service D implies average speeds of 40 to 45 miles per hour that should be <br /> considered desirable. <br /> <br /> Am A E C O M Comvarvr' <br /> <br />