My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0521.017 2002-2004
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2002-2004
>
COM 0521.017 2002-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2019 12:22:34 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 12:42:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2002-2004
Communication
0521
Point
017
Author
Jay Kimura, Prosecuting Attorney
Communications - Referred To
FC
Comments
Presented FC - 3/12/04
Document Relationships
BIL 237 Draft 01 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2002-2004
COM 0521.000 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. EVALUATION OF PROGRAMS <br />The Department of the Attorney General's Crime Prevention and Justice <br />Assistance Division (CPJAD) will utilize its current procedures to monitor and assess <br />federally funded projects. <br />A. Project Goals and Objectives <br />When an application is submitted to the CPJAD, the staff works with the agency <br />in developing acceptable (meaningful and measurable) goals and objectives for the project, <br />prior to project implementation. Performance indicators are defined in the application. In <br />some cases, the agency and the staff will develop or review the goals and objectives prior to <br />the formal submission of a project application. An application will not be processed unless <br />staff is satisfied that the goals, objectives, performance indicators, and evaluation plan are <br />adequate. Methods for the data collection and a description of the information collection of <br />target populations are also to be included as part of the evaluation plan. <br />B. Project Monitoring <br />The monitoring activities are part of the ongoing process evaluation of projects. <br />During the life of the project several products are produced to assess the implementation of <br />the project (process evaluation). <br />1. Each project has a file assigned with an individual project number and <br />sectioned off for programmatic and fiscal information documentation. <br />2. Site visit monitoring is done at least twice a year for each project. The first is <br />usually done within a month after execution of the project contract, and the second after the <br />first six months of project implementation. A copy of this report is shared with the <br />subgrantee for follow-up action as needed. <br />3. Non -site monitoring reports are completed for inclusion in the project file. <br />Non -site monitoring includes meetings with project staff, telephone contacts, and review of <br />written, required project reports submitted by agencies. <br />4. Agencies are required to submit a written progress report every six months to <br />CPJAD that detail activities and accomplishments toward project goals and objectives. <br />Report form contains a section for the discussion of any problems in implementation and <br />steps taken for resolution. <br />5. Technical assistance to project personnel is done as requested, or as deemed <br />necessary by staffs monitoring. Subgrantees are invited to participate in local training and <br />workshop events as appropriate to project activities. <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.