My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0649.004 2002-2004
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2002-2004
>
COM 0649.004 2002-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2019 12:32:49 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 12:48:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2002-2004
Communication
0649
Point
004
Author
Warren M. Yamamoto
Communications - Referred To
PWIRC
Comments
PWIRC: Close file - 2/1/05 PWIRC-Deferred - 6/14/04
Document Relationships
AGE PWIRC 02/01/2005 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Public Works & Intergovernmental Relations Committee (PWIRC)
AGE PWIRC 06/14/2004 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2002-2004\Public Works & Intergovernmental Relations Committee (PWIRC)
COM 0045.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 0649.000 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Also, the number of samples were categorized into four categories: <br />o less than 20 mph (greater than 5 mph below the speed limit), <br />0 20 to 30 mph (within 5 mph of the speed limit), <br />0 31-35 mph (5-10 mph over the speed limit), and <br />0 over 35 mph (greater than 10 mph over the speed limit). <br />The worksheets for the spot speed study before and after the sign installation, <br />and uphill and downhill direction of travel, are included in the Appendix. <br />A statistical analysis was conducted to determine whether any observed speed <br />changes were statistically valid. A t-test was conducted between the "before" <br />and "after" average speeds for each direction of travel. For this test, the null <br />hypothesis tested was that there is no difference in the mean sample speeds at <br />a 90% confidence level. The alternative hypothesis was that there is a <br />difference. The null hypothesis was accepted if the calculated t -statistic was <br />less than the t -statistic for the sample size and assumed confidence level. <br />Otherwise, the alternative hpothesis was accepted. <br />The formula for the t -statistic is: <br />t = (Xa — Xb) — (Ua — Ubl <br />Square Root {SP2 ((1/Na)-(1/Nb)]} <br />where, t = calculated t -statistic, <br />SP2 = _ (Na-1)Sa2 + (Nb-1)Sb2 the pooled variance, <br />Na + Nb -2 <br />Xa,Xb = mean sample after and before speeds, <br />Ua,Ub = mean population after and before speeds, <br />Na,Nb = Number of after and before samples, <br />Sae, Sb2 = Variance of before and after means. <br />D.3 Discussion with Kona Traffic Safety Committee <br />Members of the Kona Traffic Safety Committee were contacted twice by email to <br />obtain their opinions of the four way stop. The first contact was made in early <br />September 2003 about a month after the implementation date to obtain initial <br />opinions. A report summarizing the findings to date (but with no conclusions) <br />11. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.