My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0042.012 2002-2004
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2002-2004
>
COM 0042.012 2002-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 12:57:40 PM
Creation date
5/10/2008 12:48:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2002-2004
Communication
0042
Point
012
Author
Terri Ribordy
Communications - Referred To
Council
Document Relationships
BIL 280 Draft 05 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\1996-1998
COM 0042.000 2002-2004
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2002-2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> JUN-04-2004 10:37 qM BEACHES 1 B06 323 8230 P. 03 <br /> As written, this bill will most likely cause punishment and, in soma cases, undue financial <br /> hardship to well-meaning, 'uninformed' small-business persons, <br /> These rules era complicated, and those familiar wkh them have not even produce summary <br /> sheets that are without errors (to be discussed later). I have spent hours trying to understand <br /> these rules, I still have many queationa about whet is end what Is not allowed. <br /> I amwell-trained and experienced in public mesa media education campaigns. In my <br /> professional opinion, the preparation of a pamphlet (Section 448) is not an adequate aubHc <br /> Qduca6on clan, particularly in view of the proposed enforcement process. <br /> Please support your local businesses; and at minimum, reinstate the warning step and view it <br /> as a step in the educational process. IF the business fails to eorrect the violation, THEN i:sue <br /> e citation or summons with immediate fines. <br /> CONCERN #5 <br /> The summary shoats disseminated with the bill contain erroneous Information and should be <br /> wrrected or clarified prior to additional distribution. The following 'may' be errors in the tables: <br /> Prohibited Sions (all districts) <br /> 'Proposed Code' heading appears to belong in the second column replacing the <br /> 'Current Code' heeding. <br /> Exempsyians (allowed without a permit in all districts) <br /> I cannot find the following listed exemptions within the current code; <br /> Single temporary unUghted signs in wmmeroial/Industrial dlatrlas - 8 sq. ft., or <br /> Single temporary unlighted signs In resitlantial/agriculture tlistncta - 8 sq. ft. <br /> Sjg~~ With Permits fall Districts) <br /> Current code for a subdivision identification sign is 'one sign, a sq. ft.' (Section 3-30). <br /> The Ilated'32 sq. ft. exempt' appears to refer to exemption (a) (1) (A) which is for a sign <br /> 'announcing' the names of the architect, engineer and contractor of the building <br /> enterprise or purpose for which the building la intended. <br /> Signs Allowed With Permits - Commercialllndustrial Districts <br /> 'Ground sign' current code column does not indicate current 18' ht rostridiona, and I <br /> cannot And that'Window or painted window sign' is specifically prohlbked In the current <br /> cods as indicated on this chart. <br /> In addition, the summary sheets do not address many sign specifications which are In the bill. <br /> I suspect the individual(s) preparing this document had considerable difficulty trying to figure <br /> how to format and prosent the Information. <br /> CONCERN #8 <br /> In closing...) have left this one for last because I have no simple remedy to suggost...if t <br /> understand these rules, this bill is discriminatory between businesses located within the same <br /> -3- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.