Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Honorable Leningrad Elarionoff, Chair <br /> and Members of the Committee on Planning <br /> <br /> HAWAII COUNTY COUNCIL <br /> Page 3 <br /> June 14, 2004 <br /> Draft 2 also reorganizes some of the elements into an "Infrastructure" element, and <br /> combines the Natural Beauty, Environmental Quality, and Natural Resources elements <br /> into one. These are useful and sensible reorganizations. <br /> Vision Statements <br /> The inclusion of an overall "Vision Statement" and individual district "Vision <br /> Statements" is a significant positive innovation in Draft 2. The various Vision <br /> Statements that have been drafted have many features that would probably enjoy a broad <br /> base of support. <br /> Specific LUPAG Map Changes <br /> Draft 2 retains most of the important Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) map <br /> changes proposed in Draft 1. These include the elimination of resort areas next to <br /> Spencer Park and the Pu'ukohola Heiau in Kawaihae (F-8), and at O'oma (G-7). Draft 2 <br /> also properly incorporates the compromises at Kohanaiki (G-9, G-10a, and G-1 Ob), and <br /> at Keopuka (H-1), that were negotiated after the Draft 1 draft. <br /> Draft 2 does reject some of the proposed map changes in Draft 1. While I would like to <br /> comment on some of these later, I would like to mention a few now. <br /> Draft 2 retains the "Hawaiian Riviera" major resort project at Pohue Bay in Ka'u, and <br /> associated urban and industrial areas. Draft 1 had deleted these (I-3, I-4, and I-5). This <br /> proposed resort was originally added to the General Plan in 1988. There has been no <br /> discernable action on this project since a court action invalidated its LUC reclassification <br /> about ten years ago. The coastal property is currently in the State Land Use Conservation <br /> District. I continue to recommend that it be deleted because the project is not viable, it <br /> diminishes the credibility of the General Plan to show a major resort in this location, and <br /> even if it were viable, we should not continue promoting new coastal mega-resorts. <br /> Draft 2 also takes out amendment A-4, which would shrink the "alternate urban <br /> expansion" area around Kea'au. The current General Plan has an urban expansion area <br /> of about 3000 acres on the west (mauka) side of the Volcano Highway. This is far larger <br /> than needed for the expansion of Kea'au town. Even including the undeveloped Gateway <br /> project (32 acres), the present town of Kea'au is not a tenth the size of the urban <br /> expansion area. Most of the 3000 acres is prime agricultural land. The purpose of A-4 <br /> was to focus future urban development closer to the existing town. <br /> <br />