COM 0400.092 2002-2004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

3.2.1. the director shall, not less frequently than annually, prepare and submit to the county council an annual report. The report shall include: 3.2.1.1. growth trends and projections; 3.2.1.2. proposed changes to the boundaries of the tiered geographic areas that determine where concurrency requirements apply; 3.2.1.3. proposed changes to existing level of service standards; 3.2.1.4. proposed changes in concurrency analysis methodologies or amendments to this article; 3.2.1.5. other data, analysis, or recommendations as the director may deem appropriate, or as may be requested by the county council. 4. Procedures for concurrency Review 4.1. Submittal Requirements. All rezoning applications shall include in its environmental report sufficient information to determine the impact of the proposed development on public facilities. The information required shall include, but shall not be limited to: 4.1.1. identification of the tiered geographic area in which the project is located; 4.1.2. the proposed timing and phasing of the development; 4.1.3. the existing level of service for the various public facilities impacted by the development; 4.1.4. the incremental change in the level of service resulting from the project; 4.1.5. proposed mitigation measures, as appropriate. 4.2. Department Review and Recommendation. Upon review of the information, the department's staff report shall include at a minimum the following findings and recommendations on concurrency: 4.2.1. description of the proposed development, including the timing and phasing; 4.2.2. identification of the specific public facilities impacted by the proposed development; 4.2.3. capacity of the affected public facilities based on the adopted level of service relative to existing and approved development; and 4.2.4. availability of existing capacity to accommodate the proposed development; or if existing capacity is not available, planned capacity and the year in which such planned capacity is projected to be available to serve the proposed development. 4.2.5. recommendation: 4.2.5.1. Positive concurrency determination. If the director concludes that each public facility will be available concurrent with the impacts of the proposed development at the adopted levels of service, the department shall make a positive recommendation in its staff report. 4.2.5.2. Negative concurrency determination. If the director determines that any public facility will not be available concurrent with the impacts of the proposed development at the adopted levels of service, the director shall make a negative concurrency recommendation. 4.2.5.3. Conditional positive determination. If modification of the project scope or timing or public facility capacity improvements are feasible, the director may make a positive determination of concurrency subject to one or more of the following conditions: 9