Laserfiche WebLink
+tr or N~~ <br /> 6i' <br /> <br /> COUNTY OF HAWAII STATE OF HAWAII <br /> i <br /> ~Tf O~'M?M <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 269-04 <br /> Draft 3 <br /> A RESOLl1TION REQUF,STING THE OFFICE OF THE CORPORATION COUNSEL, <br /> COUNTY OF HAWAII, TO SEEK EXPEDITED BRIEFING AND DECISION BY THE <br /> SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI`[ IN THE APPEAL OF CIVIL CASE NO. <br /> 00-I-0192K, WALTER JOHN KELLY ET. AL. VS. 1250 OCEANSIDE PARTNERS ET. AL. <br /> WHEREAS, the Council of the County of Hawai' i is an elected, policy-making legislative <br /> body and bears considerable responsibility for planning and land use decisions in the County of <br /> Hawai' i. as well as the lawful integrity of those decisions; and, <br /> WHEREAS, the timely and just resolution of disputes pursuant to land use approvals and <br /> permits granted by the Hawaii County Council and/or county planning officials is a matter of great <br /> and enduring concern to the Council; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Council has followed with keen interest the litigation in the case of Wafer <br /> John Kelly et. a/. vs. 1250 Oceanside Partners et. a/., Civil No. 00-1-0192K (the "Lawsuit"), filed <br /> in the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit of the State of Hawaii, to include the'fhird Circuit Court's <br /> decision contained in the "Third Amended Final Judgment' rendered on August 27, 2004 (the <br /> "Judgment") and various orders issued by the judge, the Honorable Ronald Ibarra, including the <br /> land use entitlement rulings set forth in the Court's Amended Findings of Fact; Conclusions of Law; <br /> Order regarding Trial on Count IV of the Fifth Amended Complaint dated October 22, 2003 (the <br /> "Land Use Order"); and <br /> WHEREAS, resolution of the issues surrounding the Hokuli'a project in South Kona and the <br /> 1998 development agreement executed between the project developer, Oceanside 1250 Partners, and <br /> the C ounty of Hawaii, are a matter of grave and far-reaching concern to this Council, successive <br /> Councils, and the citizens of the County of Hawaii; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Hawaii County Council does not presume to speak with authority on <br /> matters pertaining to the Lawsuit, but does wish, in the spirit of plain and genial communication, to <br /> express lour basic concerns as they relate to our request for the Lawsuit, on appeal. to he heard by the <br /> Supreme Court on an expedited basis. These concerns are as follows: <br /> I. County officials require actionable clarity in statutes relating to land use and the <br /> financing of public infrastructure. <br /> Local legislators in Hawaii, as throughout the nation, are challenged to welcome and <br /> accommodate new tides of human settlement and population growth. We also are <br /> 1 <br /> <br />