My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0064.000 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0064.000 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2023 1:00:11 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 11:17:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0064
Point
000
Author
Harry Kim, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Council: Bill 21 not approved - 2/02/05 PC: Due to lack of majority "aye" votes, forwards Bill 21 to Council with a negative recommendation - 1/20/05
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 02/02/2005 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Council
AGE PC 01/20/2005 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 021 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
BIL 021 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0064.001 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 0064.002 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
REP PC 005 01/20/2005 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
And, I guess, I might be willing to go on record as saying that I would, what, I'd do what <br /> I can to veto any gate within 60 feet of Palani Road. I'm certainly in agreement that that <br /> would be a hazardous location. <br /> YUEN: What do the, are there subdivision, current subdivision documents <br /> that talk about how this would be decided, how the subdivision would decide? Would it <br /> strictly be by majority vote? <br /> PACK: Off hand, I don't recall exactly how the CC&R's are worded. But <br /> I do know that my wife and I have talked with our attorney, Matt Jewell, and Matt has <br /> essentially advised us that unless all 15 owners are in agreement that we should not try to <br /> install a gate anywhere. <br /> HARLOW: The CC&R's don't specifically address the installation of a gate <br /> per se. <br /> YUEN: I would willing to modify the condition so that it's covenant- <br /> binding on all the future lot owners that they, that should the issue of a gate come up that <br /> they would not approve it unless it was located minimum 60 feet from the Palani Road <br /> right-of--way. In the meantime, I would want to see a letter from your attorney to the <br /> effect that that would prevent a gate by being installed closer by some kind of majority <br /> vote. You know, what you said is that you'd have to have unanimous agreement of the <br /> lot owners to install a gate. That being the case, I don't know what the basis for that is, <br /> you know, not having read any of your documents or not knowing why you said that. if <br /> you could get a letter to that effect before we took this to the Council, I'd be satisfied <br /> with that. If not, we would, we'd have to revisit this at the Council level. Let me work <br /> on a condition for a few minutes. <br /> FUJIKAWA: Pam, I have a question. In the CC&R's, I believe that you're <br /> reading the CC&R's. Is there anything in the CC&R's that states that any changes has to <br /> <br /> be a majority vote in the <br /> HARLOW: Well, under the Roadway Maintenance section of the CC&R's, <br /> there is a section regarding votes, regarding repair and maintenance. And it states, "For <br /> <br /> purposes of this Agreement, any decision to incur, expend and/or use funds or monies to <br /> operate, maintain, upkeep, repair, protect, improve and/or preserve the roadway/utility <br /> easement, including but not limited to paving or repaving the roadway/utility easement <br /> <br /> must be affirmatively approved by owners oftwo-thirds (2/3) of the lots. Any decision <br /> so confirmed shall be binding on all owners. The Design Committee shall have the <br /> authority to execute maintenance decisions of the lot owners and to assess upon each <br /> <br /> owner the owner's pro rata share of costs in accordance with Article VIII. The <br /> expenditure of any and all funds, monies and/or expenses so approved and decided upon <br /> shall be documented in writing and signed by all parties so affirming same." <br /> 4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.