My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0407.001 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
1996-1998
>
COM 0407.001 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 11:35:42 AM
Creation date
5/10/2008 7:54:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
1996-1998
Communication
0407
Point
001
Author
Donald Ikeda, County Clerk
Communications - Referred To
FC
Comments
Presented: FC - 8/5/97
Communications - File Code
AUD
Document Relationships
AGE FC 08/05/1997 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\1996-1998\Finance Committee (FC)
COM 0407.000 1996-1998
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Hawaii County Council July 2, 1997 <br /> MR. GIURDEMAN: The Charter doesn't--well, this whole <br /> question. We had one lawsuit in 1994 which was <br /> brought on this point and it was dismissed. The <br /> Circuit Court Judge--it didn't go past Circuit <br /> Court--felt that the question was a political question <br /> to be determined by you in adherence to the doctrine <br /> of separation of power, she was not going to involve <br /> herself. That's the one decision that we have. <br /> Of course, we have the rule, the Council rule that <br /> says that the budget review is the program review. I <br /> think, in my opinion, this meets the bare letter of <br /> the law. It clearly does not meet the spirit of the <br /> law, and in anticipation of your question, I have done <br /> some reading in some budget books about what a program <br /> review is and what it's supposed to entail and what it <br /> is supposed to do--is to match the objectives of the <br /> program with the results of the program to see if it's <br /> cost effective. <br /> Before we even start talking about a program review, <br /> we've got to define what's a program. A program is <br /> the drug eradication program--the aerial drug <br /> eradication effort a program or is it part of a <br /> larger--is it an activity which is part of a larger <br /> program, which is drug enforcement, or is drug <br /> enforcement merely part of a larger program, which is <br /> law enforcement? <br /> So, I would suggest that before undertaking a "program <br /> review," the first thing to do is decide at what level <br /> you consider an activity to be a program. <br /> MR. TYLER: So from your perspective, as Corporation <br /> Counsel, then, we are adhering to the Charter, I mean, <br /> in terms of this intent? <br /> M.R. WtJRDEMAN: Based on that experience, I would say <br /> that--well, what I said before. We meet the bare <br /> letter of the law and I think the spirit of the law <br /> and what the law intended, which is not only for this <br /> program, but for all other programs, street lights, or <br /> whatever, that there be a bureaucracy reviewing it, <br /> which is--if you're going to do it, is a major effort. <br /> MR. TYLER: So in terms of Draft 2 then, of <br /> Resolution 94-97, the amendment offered regarding a <br /> mandatory program review is--it's a stipulation we <br /> can't put on this contract? would it have to be in a <br /> different resolution or--how would you recommend that <br /> we deal with what the wishes of the maker were? <br /> 13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.