Laserfiche WebLink
Bethea, Skip <br /> From: Gale Sansone [kgmama@earthlink.net] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 11:01 AM <br /> To: Council Testimony <br /> Subject: Bill #4 Additional Information for my testimony <br /> Subject: FW: >From Gale Sansone Bill 4 <br /> Dear Chairman Gary Safarik ~S~ Council Members<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft- <br /> <br /> com:office:office" <br /> Please allow the following testimony from me regarding Bill Number 4 Animals. <br /> I have just reviewed Bill No. 4 and have some great concerns and they are as follows: <br /> 1) How will this Bill effect current businesses as dog boarding facilities on Ag land? Will this business fall under <br /> some umbrella to protect it from any complaints or will these facilities be included in this Bill? <br /> 2) Personal Dog owners living on Ag land who have dogs that bark when the pigs run or when people approach the <br /> property, how will we be effected? <br /> 3) Section 4-25. I think this section should be re-instated. Every effort should be made to solve a problem before <br /> the police are called. I will give you an example of when I was living in the city with two dogs. I had a nasty neighbor <br /> who hated dogs and he called the police to complain about my dogs barking under his bedroom window all night. The <br /> police came to my house and would not believe me until they called my vet who was currently boarding my dogs to <br /> confirm that my dogs were not.even home at that time nor had they been picked up as of that time. What protection <br /> does the dog owner have from malicious people who file malicious complaints? <br /> It is not a simple thing to decide if the barking of a dog is a nuisance or not. It really depends on who is <br /> making the complaint as some people complain if a dog barks for few minutes but then shuts up. You <br /> cannot expect dogs to NEVER bark. This in fact is one of the reasons why we keep them as they warn of <br /> strangers approaching and would be intruders. We are all aware of the burglaries the Big Island is currently <br /> dealing with. <br /> 4) Section 4-17 Cruelty to Animals. Laws pertaining to loose dogs in the back of trucks should be considered as <br /> this is a very dangerous situation to dogs, pedestrians and other vehicles. I know several dogs that have been <br /> maimed or killed by jumping out or falling out of moving vehicles. <br /> And something that would cover mistreatment of animals kept on short chains, small kennels, unsanitary <br /> situations any situation that would be harmful to the animal. ~ Z r! <br /> Comm. Ho. <br /> 1 Ref. To: ~~w~M~/ <br /> Ref. Uate MQR <br /> <br />