COM 0452.015 1996-1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

' Oct-08-97 17:55 S.P.S. Inc. 505 a88 5360 P.02 Seamount has conr_inuously stated in open hearing and i*: writing that if the APD prcJect is approved in its present form, the Private Road will not be aed as a basis for further rezoning makai of the APIA , Neither Sally F<ice nor I ever represented to any of you that the long existing easement rights of record were going to be limited to the APD. Lunar Freivalds and Barbara Allen may have misunderstood the meaning of rezoning, but Sally is quite certain of wha~ she said, and has a reputation for being true to her word. when you purchased your lot from me ten years aqc, you knew >rhat I owned the property makai. As part of "Contractual Agreements that Survive Closing", you agreed not tv ob;ect to further development of the property makai or Easement A-5. I expect these personal contractual obligations to be honored in good faith. As a long time resident., T find it d:.fficult to believe that these pre-existing lots which have existed since C~:e 1930' s were r.ot. in your practical knowledge. Nor do I understand how this was not <:learl}' understood frorn our recent detailed conversations. Our continued statemEnt that there would be no fur*_:r,er rezcr.ing makai, leads to the question: what is existing or permitted makai of the APD? In the case of Andrea and Brian Lievens, A.~:drea as my realtor in r~,any transactions, kr:ew about the preexisting lots makai. The exact number of these !•ots was discussed :}~,e night before the Planning Commission hearing, and Brian went on tv discuss this with ward Fujimoto i?.cq. the nexr day, August 7, 1997. Allegatio~:s o` misreLresentation or Surprise do not hold up. The record shows that Seamount initiated an ongoing dig Logue Witt: the r.e_ghbors from toe