My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0493.003 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2004-2006
>
COM 0493.003 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 4:00:02 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 11:41:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2004-2006
Communication
0493
Point
003
Author
Anonymous
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Presented PC - 11/8/05 PC-41: Forwards Bill 162 to Council with a negative recommendation - 11/8/05
Document Relationships
AGE PC 11/08/2005 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
BIL 162 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0493.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
REP PC 041 11/08/2005 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- Pages 1 of.! <br /> Pari$, Charlotte <br /> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2005 3.10 PM <br /> To: Hoffmann, Pete <br /> Subject: drart letter of testimony, for your input <br /> (Thank you for our chat. This is a rough draft of a letter, however I'm now seriously considering turning it info a <br /> speech and basically reading it in tomorrow's testimony period, from your office. You are a very persuasive manl <br /> Please give input on what to keep, toss, or edit - I'd very much appreciate your confidential guidance on the <br /> content and strategy. I thought Linda had a wonderful point the more I thought about it, so I threw In a coupe <br /> sentences to reflect that too. <br /> Dear Councilman Hoffman, <br /> I, and many of our neighbors, joined you and spoke at a citizens' forum in October 2005 in V~Jaimea to express <br /> serious concerns about flood conditions in Waimea and about proposed residential building in our <br /> neighborhoods. <br /> This testimony is to state strongly that, before one more home or development is approved by the County fC~ the <br /> Waimea area, the conditions MUST be fixed that presently and historically cause for our homes to flood. hlr~re <br /> structures will increase the terrible problem that has already damaged many homes and threatened human ivc s. <br /> It would be negligent of the County to allow more homes to be developed before fixing a problem we clearly <br /> have. You have heard hours of testimony on these problems. Let's not pretend they don't exist. <br /> Our own experience: Steve and 1 own a home on just under six acres south of Mamalahoa by Hohola Street In <br /> March 2004, and again in April 2004, in rains that initially were rumored as "100 year" but eventually were d~~flred <br /> as "25 year rains," a section of our home was flooded in fast rivers of water. The flow was so strong that an aeult <br /> fit male residing in an adjacent property tried but could not cross to help us. The road was blocked to all trafric. <br /> Clogged culverts above us with huge amounts of accumulated debris were photographed by another Height ar, <br /> reflecting inadequate protection and poor County maintenance It took us several months, and more than se>vera! <br /> thousand dollars, to recover from the incident. <br /> This was the first time in history that our property had ever flooded, to anyone's knowledge or by any recordv. <br /> Our particular home and property structures are not located within agovernment-designated flood zone. As such. <br /> we never anticipated such flooding on our property, and to our knowledge it never occurred previously on C~ s <br /> parcel. <br /> Through the events that followed, Steve and I came to understand that this problem would most likely have ievar <br /> occurred had the County more responslbry done Its job in recent year in maintaining Culverts and granting (c r I <br /> should say not granting) building approvals on plans to develop housing in the hills above us. with scanty <br /> drainage provisions. <br /> The Federal Agricultural Department walked and studied our property and the sunounding area for damage <br /> shortly after the storms. They sent in their local staff (Gerry Williams and others, stationed here on our Island; as <br /> <br /> well as supervisors and specialists who flew in from Honolulu. We were told in absolute terms that the flootl!nc <br /> <br /> was caused by housing having been developed in recent years in the hills above us (on the north side of the <br /> highway) without proper planning by the government and by developers. It was explained that as housing aid <br /> structures go up. more and more impervious land surfaces are created, and that, simply stated, building approvals <br /> <br /> were given without the necessary provisions for proper drainage to protect what already existed. When nett Ovate' <br /> has no land to soak into or planned avenues to flow, It flows to lower points, and homes (dr markets, or stree~~ } <br /> flood. That is what happened to us, and others. <br /> At the time of the 2004 floods, our daughter was seven years old. There is no question that a child could <br /> potentially drown In water conditions that are so severe that strong men cannot pass due to the intensive ru::h of <br /> the water. As a mother, this is perhaps where my deepest concerns fall. We do have videotape of the rushing <br /> Comm. No.__ ~'f q 3.3 <br /> 11/8/2005 Ref. TosPresestwd ~ - <br /> Re#. Uate,~iOV R ~nn~ <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.