My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
BIL 246 Draft 04 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Bills
>
2004-2006
>
BIL 246 Draft 04 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2008 8:58:38 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 11:57:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
BIL
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
2004-2006
Bill/Resolution
246
Draft
04
Introducer
Pete Hoffmann, Councilmember
Referred To
COUNCIL
Action 1
Presented: Council - 6/5/06
Action 2
Council: Bill 246, Draft 4 amended to Draft 5 - 6/05/06
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 06/05/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Council
COM 0762.066 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 0762.066 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MtY os per. <br /> ~P?;c~ a <br /> ui£ <br /> COUNTY OF HAWAII STATE OF HAWAII <br /> •?~h~Of M~~' <br /> BILL NO. za6 <br /> Draft 4 <br /> ORDINANCE NO. <br /> AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 23, HAWAII COUNTY CODE 1983 <br /> (2005 EDITION, AS AMENDED), RELATING TO INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR <br /> SUBMITTAL OF A SUBDIVISION APPLICATION, REVISIONS TO CERTAIN TIME AND <br /> STREET REQUIREMENTS, AND MINOR "HOUSEKEEPING" CHANGES TO THE <br /> SUBDIVISION CODE. <br /> BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII: <br /> SECTION 1. Purpose and Findings. A recent Hawaii Supreme Court decision <br /> invalidates practices that the County planning department has followed for at least thirty years, <br /> and forces the County to adopt changes in the subdivision code, or risk invalidating hundreds of <br /> past and pending subdivision applications. The court decision, ieslie vs. Board of Appeals, held <br /> that it was mandatory that some information be contained in subdivision applications, and upheld <br /> a decision of the Third Circuit Court invalidating a subdivision that the County had approved <br /> without the required information. <br /> The subdivision code states that the initial application for a subdivision, the "preliminary <br /> <br /> • plat", is supposed to contain certain information. For many years, the practice has been to defer <br /> some of this information to a later stage in the subdivision application, or to accept the <br /> preliminary plat for further processing while asking the subdivider to supplement the <br /> information. The most significant difference between past practice and the strict letter of the <br /> Code is section 23-66(7), which requires that the application contain a description of <br /> "[i]mprovements to be made by the developer and the approximate time such improvements are <br /> to be completed. Sufficient detail regarding proposed improvements shall be submitted so that <br /> they may be checked for compliance with the objectives of these regulations, State laws and <br /> other applicable County ordinances." The actual practice has been that the preliminary plat is <br /> circulated to the department of public works and department of water supply, who then give a <br /> general description o£the standard of road and water system that must be installed. This is made <br /> a requirement of the tentative approval of the subdivision. The subdivider then prepares detailed <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.