My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
BIL 329 Draft 01 2004-2006
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Bills
>
2004-2006
>
BIL 329 Draft 01 2004-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2017 12:00:29 PM
Creation date
5/9/2008 12:05:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
BIL
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
2004-2006
Bill/Resolution
329
Draft
01
Introducer
Virginia Isbell, Council Member
Referred To
PC
Action 1
PC-112: Recommends to commit Bill 329 to the Planning Commission and Planning Director - 9/19/06
Action 2
Council: Approved to commit to Planning Director and Planning Commission; PC-112 adopted- 10/16/06
Action 3
Council: Recommited to the Planning Director and Commission per request in Comm. 165 dated February 6, 2007 - February 21, 2007; never taken back up.
Status
Deferred
Noes
0-
Absent
0-
Excused
0-
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 10/16/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Council
AGE PC 09/19/2006 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
COM 0165.000 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
COM 1037.000 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 1037.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
COM 1037.002 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
REP PC 112 09/19/2006 2004-2006
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2004-2006\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section _-6. Jurisdiction. <br />This chapter applies to all new subdivision and site plan applications for new construction <br />received by the planning director pursuant to chapters 23 and 25, Hawaii County Code, after the <br />effective date of this chapter. <br />Section _-7. Final determination of adequate public facilities. <br />(a) If road facilities are found to be adequate subject to section _-13 of this chapter, <br />water facilities are found to be adequate subject to section _-17 of this chapter, and sewer <br />facilities are found to be adequate subject to section _-22 of this chapter, then public facilities <br />shall be deemed adequate and the new development in question may be approved. <br />(b) If road facilities are found to be inadequate subject to section 43 of this chapter, <br />or water facilities are found to be inadequate subject to section -- 17 of this chapter, or sewer <br />facilities are found to be inadequate subject to section _-22 of this chapter, then public facilities <br />shall be deemed inadequate and the new development in question shall not be approved. <br />Article 3. Roads. <br />Section _-10. Road standard. <br />All new development shall be served by an adequate network of roads. <br />Section -41. Developer submission. <br />The developer of the new development in question shall be responsible for inquiring with <br />DPW regarding the necessity for a traffic impact study and submitting a copy of DPW's <br />response to the need for a traffic impact study to the planning director. <br />Section _42. Traffic impact study. <br />(a) Any traffic impact study performed subject to section — -I I of this chapter shall <br />include in its scope those projects in the development pipeline that are geographically proximate <br />to the new development being evaluated under this chapter. <br />(b) If DPW recommends a traffic impact study based on section — -I of this chapter, <br />then the application for new development shall be held until such time as the developer <br />completes a traffic impact study, the study is reviewed by DPW, and it is found to be in <br />compliance with DPW's regulations for traffic impact studies, as amended from time to time. <br />(c) If the County council adopts a resolution expressing concern with the traffic -related <br />impacts of new development, then the application for new development shall be held until such <br />time as the developer completes a traffic impact study reviewed by the County's duly designated <br />engineer and found to be in compliance with DPW's regulations for traffic impact studies, as <br />amended from time to time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.