COM 0766.023 2004-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1. The grade of the roadway is elevated above and in very close proximity of the makai side homes (Show photos north side of road),ifthere was a accident and the vehicle went over the wall there would be serious property damage as well as a possible personal injury if the home owner was in their bedroom. 2. Deterioration of a 40 foot rock retaining which is already showing signs of water failure (show wall photos) When it rains water flows like little waterfalls between the rocks (not from the drain pipes)on the lower corner flushing mud from inside the retaining wall 3. The two homes on the south side of the road Lot #76 & #77 have H road have setbacks that are less that 10 feet. A 15 foot setback is required for the front and rear of a house.(HCC sec 25-5-7) (any side of a house facing the road and adjacent to the road considered a front.) If this is true the rough stub road out will only have a 50 foot right away which is insufficient for the intended usage of a collector road away HCC 23-41). (south photo) RE: Richard Wheelock letter to the county council dated October 13, 2006 asserting that the mid level road is safe and wide enough to be dedicated is in my opinion completely erroneous We believe that the location and the present condition of the roadway H is dangerous and poses a serious hazard. For the safety and well being of the MG homeowners we respectfully request that you do not allow KCE to develop and use this access road dividing phase 2 from phase 3 of MG, but instead authorize re-location the roadway mauka and adjacent to MG on Brian Cooks parcels, and accept the written offer by Rodger Wheelock to build it.(Scott Bell letter August 28,2006)show arial photos Thank You