My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0067.031 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 0067.031 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 3:26:19 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 5:16:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
0067
Point
031
Author
Brenda Ford, Councilmember
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Presented: Council - 1/19/07
Document Relationships
BIL 345 Draft 01 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2004-2006
COM 0067.000 2004-2006
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2004-2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
delays. The local government should also make efforts to insure that the availability of such <br /> mechanisms ;a well known within the community. <br /> Q. Whea, if ever, can a local government limit the number of group homes that can locate <br /> in a certain area?' <br /> A concern expressed by some local government of3iciels and neighborhood residents is that <br /> certain jurisdictions, governments, or particular neighborhoods within a lutisdiction, may come <br /> to have more than their "fair share" of ou homes. There are legal ways to address this <br /> concern. a air Housing Act does not prohibit most governmental progs~un.^. designed to <br /> encourage people OY a particular race to move to noibhborhoods occupied predominantly by <br /> people of another race. A local governtent that believes a particular azca tvithin its boundaries <br /> has its "fair shaze" of group homes, could offer incentives to providers to locate future homes in <br /> other neighhorhoodS. <br /> However, some state and local governments have tried to address this concern by enacting laws <br /> requiring that group hwues be at a certain minimum distance from one ancther. The Department \n <br /> of Justice and HUD take the osition, and most coons that have addressed the issue agree, tha ~a\P <br /> ~rl 00 <br /> dcnsi restrictions are generally inconci.atent with the Farr ousme Act. e so c lave, gra°~ <br /> owever, that i a nci hborhood came to be corn ose arc o rou hotnes, that could See lad <br /> versel act in viduals with disabilities and would be inconsistent with the ob'ecdve of <br /> integrating persons with disa ilities into the communi . Espect yin the licensing and <br /> regulatory process, it is appropriate to be concerned about the setting far a group home. A <br /> consideration ofover-concentration could be considered in this cutttext. This objective does not, <br /> however, justify requiring separations which have the affect of foreclosing. group homes from <br /> locating in entire neighborhoods. <br /> Q. What kinds of health and safety regulations can be imposed upon group homes? <br /> The great majority of group homes for persons with disabilities are subject to state regulations <br /> intended to ptrotect the health and safety of their residents. The Department Of justice and HUD <br /> believe, as do responsible group home operators, that such licensing schemes azc necessary and <br /> legitimate. Neighbors who have concerns that a particular group home is being operated <br /> inappropriately should be able to bring their concerns to the attention of tYte responsible licensing <br /> agency. We encourage the states <br /> to commit the resources needed to make these systems responsive to resident and conununity <br /> needs and concerns. <br /> Re¢ulation and licensine regLuirements for group homes azc themselves subiect to scrutiny under <br /> the Fair Housing Act. Such requirements based on health and safety concerns can be <br /> discrirnina[ory themselves or maybe cited sometimes to disguise discriminatory motives behind <br /> attempts to exclude group homes from a community. Regttlatnr~ moat also recognize that not all <br /> individuals with disabilities living in group home settings desire or need the same level of <br /> services or protection. For example, it may be appropriate to require heightened fire safety <br /> measures in a group home for people who are unable to move about without assistance. But for <br /> another group of persons with disabilities who do not desire or need such assistance, it would not <br /> a <br /> • o~°ga~ <br /> yn0 <br /> <br /> 90 39tid OON L6959Z6 OZ~Gt L00Z/St/i0 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.