My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
BIL 061 Draft 01 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Bills
>
2006-2008
>
BIL 061 Draft 01 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2009 10:03:20 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 5:25:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
BIL
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
2006-2008
Bill/Resolution
061
Draft
01
Introducer
Dominic Yagong, Councilmember; Chair, Finance Committee
Referred To
FC
Action 1
FC-94: Recommends passage of Bill 61 on first reading - 4/17/07
Action 2
09Council: Bill 61 amended to Draft 2 - 5/16/07
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2007/05/16 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Council
COM 0194.000 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
COM 0194.013 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
COM 0194.014 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
REP FC 093 04/17/2007 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2006-2008\Finance Committee (FC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Hawaii County Council <br /> <br /> Mazch 1, 2007 <br /> <br /> Project Selection Criteria <br /> In selecting the projects, funding requests from the agencies were initially screened to ensure that the agency had the capacity to <br /> implement the project during the fiscal year (i.e., whether to defer or phase the project), that current requests were reconciled with <br /> previous appropriations (i.e., unused amounts from previous appropriations were sufficient to carry the project through the coming fiscal <br /> yeaz), that the projects were not more appropriately funded through the operational budget (e.g., minor repairs), and that the projects were <br /> as equitably distributed geographically as possible while meeting the selection criteria discussed below. <br /> The selected projects met at least one of the following criteria (see Table 2): <br /> 1) Legal mandate-approximately $30.9M relates to unfunded mandates such as ADA, EPA gang cesspool prohibitions, and <br /> hazardous materials; <br /> 2) Corrects a major deficiency-approximately $52.3M relates to meeting basic level of service goals; <br /> 3) Critical for public safety or health-approximately $14.4 relates to protection of public safety (e.g., emergency response, flood <br /> control, crime control, traffic safety) or public health (hazazdous waste); <br /> 4) Environment/lifestyle-approximately $6M relates to proactive programs that relate to community planning initiatives, water <br /> quality improvements, or healthy lifestyles; <br /> 5) Improves operational efficiency or maintains/improves existing assets-approximately $36.2M enhances delivery of services or <br /> maintains existing assets. <br /> Of the 85 Capital Budget projects, 27 are new facilities or miscellaneous improvements ($69.3M), 19 are replacement of existing facilities <br /> ($38.8M), 29 are improvements to existing facilities ($30.6M), and 10 are various combinations of new, existing, or replacements <br /> ($1.9M) (see Table 3). Approximately 47% of the budget is for public health and safety projects ($65.SM), followed by culture/recreation <br /> (27% or $39.SM), transportation projects (13% or $17.9M), and general government facilities (13% or $17.7M) (see Table 4). <br /> Funding Sources <br /> Capital projects are typically funded by debt (bonds, State Revolving Fund loans), revenue sources (fuel tax, other special revenues), State <br /> grants, and various federal grant or loan sources. The Capital Budget presented herein includes those capital projects intended to be <br /> funded in whole or part by bonds or special revenues, fair share contributions, or State Revolving Fund loans. The Capital Budget also <br /> includes appropriations to receive specified Federal and State grants. <br /> a <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.