My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0176.025 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 0176.025 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 11:16:04 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 5:29:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
0176
Point
025
Author
Brenda Ford, Councilmember Chair, Public Works and Intergovernmental Relations Committee
Communications - Referred To
PWIRC
Comments
Presented: 4/3/07
Document Relationships
AGE PWIRC 04/03/2007 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Public Works & Intergovernmental Relations Committee (PWIRC)
BIL 051 Draft 02 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
COM 0176.000 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FEMA -Community Rating System Resource Center Page 1 of 1 <br /> Costs and Benefits <br /> <br /> Communities should prepare and implement those activities which best deal with their local <br /> problems, whether or not they are creditable under the CRS. Few, if any, of the CRS activities will <br /> produce premium reductions equal to or in excess of their implementation costs. In considering <br /> <br /> whether to undertake a new floodplain management activity, a community must consider all of the <br /> benefits the activity will provide (not just insurance premium reductions) in order to determine <br /> <br /> whether it is worth implementing. <br /> <br /> a. Costs <br /> No fee is charged for a community to apply for participation in the CRS. The only costs the <br /> <br /> community incurs are those of implementing creditable floodplain management activities and the <br /> <br /> staff time needed to prepare the CRS Application. <br /> b. Benefits <br /> It is important to note that reduced flood insurance rates are only one of the rewards a community <br /> receives from participating in the CRS. There are several other benefits. <br /> First, the CRS floodplain management activities provide enhanced public safety, a reduction in <br /> damage to property and public infrastructure, avoidance of economic disruption and losses, <br /> reduction of human suffering, and protection of the environment. <br /> Second, a community can evaluate the effectiveness of its flood program against a nationally <br /> recognized benchmark. <br /> Third, technical assistance in designing and implementing some activities is available at no charge. <br /> Fourth, a CRS community's flood program benefits from having an added incentive to maintain its <br /> flood programs over the years. The fact that the community's CRS status could be affected by the <br /> elimination of aflood-related activity or a weakening of the regulatory requirements for new <br /> development, should be taken into account by the governing board when considering such actions. <br /> A similar system used in fire insurance rating has had a strong impact on the level of support local <br /> governments give to their fire protection programs. <br /> Fifth, implementing some CRS activities, such as floodplain management planning, can help a <br /> community qualify for certain Federal assistance programs. <br /> http://training.fema.gov/EMI Web/CRS/m 1 s3main_a.htm 3/22/2007 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.