My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0176.043 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 0176.043 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2008 11:18:02 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 5:42:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
0176
Point
043
Author
Nancy E. Burns. P.E.
Communications - Referred To
PWIRC
Comments
Presented: PWIRC - 5/15/07
Document Relationships
AGE PWIRC 05/01/2007 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Public Works & Intergovernmental Relations Committee (PWIRC)
BIL 051 Draft 02 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
COM 0176.000 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I have 22 years of experience in the design of highways, water systems, drainage <br /> systems, affordable and market housing subdivisions, commercial subdivisions, <br /> agricultural subdivisions, utility infrastructure and the preparation of Environmental <br /> Impact Statements. I have worked in the public sector for the County of Hawaii <br /> Department of Public Works and in the private sector for various firms so t am aware of <br /> issues and concerns regarding both public and private interests. <br /> T did not have time to review all of the additional amendments that were introduced to <br /> Bill 51 at the May ] ~ meeting. However, one amendment struck me as having <br /> extraordinary consequences for the agricultural industry. The amendment I am referring <br /> <br /> to is 27-20 (g). lt? Hawai`i Couutv agricultural subdivisions may exist in areas uphill <br /> from urban areas and may have severe flooding consequences: therefore, new <br /> :~¢riculturxl subdivisions shall comply with all requirements of Article 4, Section 27- <br /> 17-26 in that redirected flood channels shall meet base flood elevation levels and <br /> appropriate design and structures shall be provided to retain all rainfall up to a <br /> 100-vear storm event on the agricultural land on which the rainfall fell, <br /> In this regard I was just recently asked to consider storing all storm water generated from <br /> a 100-year, 24 hour storm on-site fora 9 acre community park project being <br /> constructed by anon-profit organization. The ]00-year, 24 hour rainfall in this location <br /> is approximately 7 inches. The results indicated that I would need a retention pond that <br /> was capable of storing 4.7 acre feet. In order to achieve this storage, one could build a <br /> one acre pond approximately 4.7 feet deep. The volume in cubic yazds of such a facility <br /> would be approximately 7,582 cubic yards. A rough estimate of the cost to construct the <br /> pond is $90,000. In addition, construction of a drainage system to pipe the water to the <br /> pond would be required. A really rough estimate of the cost of the piping and catch basin <br /> system is $200,000. The retention pond would require a drywell system to dispose of the <br /> water from the retention pond. My estimated cost for the drywells system is $60,000. <br /> The total rough cost for the system is $350,000. This does not include the loss of usable <br /> acreage I'or the park facility which in today's market could be $250,000 or more. I <br /> estimate that a conventional system using a 10 year storm with drywells would cost <br /> $40,000 to $80,000. <br /> If this park was located in Hilo where the 100-year, 24 hour storm rainfall is <br /> approximately 22 inches, the retention storage required would be 15.9 acre feet, over <br /> three times that of Kona. The number of catch basins and drywell and the pipe sizes <br /> would have to be much larger. This would entail substantially more costs and could <br /> make the project cost prohibitive, especially for anon-profit organization. <br /> My point is that I strongly advise the county council to seek the opinions of other <br /> engineering professional to confirm or dispute my estimates and then to analyze the <br /> economic impact to the entire island. I believe that adequate drainage is essential to this <br /> island. I am however concerned that we do not place an insurmountable economic <br /> burden on the use of land for agricultural purposes as I believe that agriculture is an <br /> extremely important land use. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.