My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0376.007 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 0376.007 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2008 8:41:55 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 5:42:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
0376
Point
007
Author
Cheryl R. Reis; Marjorie Gushiken
Communications - Referred To
PC
Comments
Presented: P/PC - 5/15/07
Document Relationships
AGE PC 05/15/2007 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Plannning Committee (PC)
BIL 096 Draft 01 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
COM 0376.000 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
discussed as being undecided but between 5 and 10 feet. Also, that all <br />the plants were to be removed to allow for installation of more <br />diagonal parking spaces. <br />If a wall is installed on the boundary of any parking area, particularly <br />since the PPB lot is much higher than our homes, any opening between <br />the bottom of the wall and the ground would concentrate the flow of <br />fumes, and, since they are heavier than air, they would intrude further <br />on our living spaces. <br />If more spaces can be added to PPB's lot in this manner why, <br />another parking lot which will and has inflicted a health hazard <br />and aggravation on us in our homes. <br />The PPB developers are parties to the applicant and its <br />representatives, The PPB developer did not fulfilled his <br />promises which we believed and therefore didn't oppose PPB's <br />development. Perhaps, Pete's Belly Busta's, (formerly Jilly's Deli) is <br />a non-professional space out-of-character with the developer's original <br />plan presented to us. How much traffic and parking are impacted by <br />this entity since its customers aren't limited to PPB clients? <br />Further, the occupants of the building have changed fairly often with <br />different operating hours over the years. It is also clear that the <br />number of Women's Imaging Center employees were not provided for <br />in the original plan. There are vehicles and activities in the PPB lot up <br />to midnight very often. Was the planning adequate and if it wasn't, <br />why not really be a good neighbor and not destroy a neighborhood and <br />adjust your operations to fit the original plan or find alternatives on <br />other commercial properties in the Ponahawai complex. <br />Ttip PPB developers and their representatives likewise have <br />not fulfilled the conditions of Rezoning, Final Plan Approval. <br />Hawaii County Ordinance 95-33 and Final Subdivision Approval. <br />The original plan shows a roadway to Punahele from/to PPB. A site <br />visit would make it clear that the lay of the traffic pattern at PPB could <br />easily accommodate this road right now. The "proposed use" of the <br />"subject property" is a parking lot, but once approved for CN-SO it <br />could become anything. Does the PPB developers' track record of non- <br />compliance and failures to meet promises instill confidence since they <br />are major players in AOAOv? It certainly doesn't for us. Please don't <br />divide a neighborhood and destroy what little peace, privacy and <br />health we have left -preserve our quality of life. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.