Laserfiche WebLink
County of Hawaii, County Council Page z <br /> Affordable Housing Requirements for Industrial Developments <br /> Based on these findings, Bill t56 proposes to amend Chapter tt of the Hawaii County <br /> Code to require that industrial uses fulfill the affordable housing requirements. <br /> Specifically, the bill proposes that "industrial enterprises generating more than one <br /> hundred employees on a full-time equivalent basis, whether new or an addition or <br /> reconstruction to existing facilities, and including one or more businesses at the same or <br /> adjacent sites, must earn one affordable housing credit for every four full-time equivalent <br /> <br /> jobs created." <br /> Proposed Bill ><56 is Unconstitutional <br /> Bill 156 is unconstitutional because (i) there needs to be a rational nexus justified by <br /> thorough and detailed studies of the workforce jobs required and generated by the <br /> proposed commercial or industrial development; and it must satisfy a (z) proportional <br /> nexus test showing a legal justification in requiring a certain percentage of affordable <br /> units. The County must demonstrate a clear rational and proportional nexus between <br /> market cost developments and the imposition ofbelow-market cost housing set-asides. <br /> To illustrate further, a memo by Professor David Callies of the William S. Richardson <br /> School of Law addressing the Kauai County Council during their deliberation of <br /> affordable housing requirements for residential developments of five or more dwelling <br /> units and "large" resort commercial and industrial developments (see attached), explains <br /> the rational and proportional nexus requirement of such set-asides: <br /> "As to housing exactions or set-asides on commercial development, the princdple <br /> -indeed virtually only-federal case approving such set-asides did so only after <br /> the local government reguiring such set-asides engaged in thorough and detailed <br /> studies of the workforce jobs required and generated by the proposed commercial <br /> development, which requirements were then cut in half-far less than the 40% <br /> which the draft County of Kauai Housing Policy Ordinance would require of <br /> such commercial development. " <br /> Proposed Bill iS6 is Counterintuitive to the Development of Affordable <br /> Housing <br /> The general rule in Hawaii has been that overly aggressive affordable housing <br /> requirements do not result in more affordable units being built. Such requirements <br /> result in fewer affordable units being built. <br /> As with other counties in the state, the County of Hawaii has an insufficient supply of <br /> rentals and for sale units for all income groups. Maui County just recently passed a <br /> workforce housing policy to try and address this issue, Kauai County is also in the <br /> process of adopting a housing policy, and the State Legislature is also in the process of <br /> finding ways to increase the supply of affordable housing. <br /> LURF participated in the Joint Legislative Housing and Homeless Task Force, the Mayor <br /> of the City and County of Honolulu's Affordable Housing Advisory Committee, and <br /> Affordable Housing Task Force created by Senate Concurrent Resolution t35 in zoo4. A <br /> common finding in each of these efforts was that there was a need to provide <br /> more housing in all income categories, and that one of the major problems <br /> <br />