Laserfiche WebLink
require the establishment of the depth of the "100-year flood" An agricultural <br /> subdivision or erection of agricultural structures may require preparation of a <br /> flood study. (Sec. 27-20(b), (d), and (e)) <br /> Developments and farms will need to retain and handle the runoff <br /> from the "one-hundred year" storm. I think this part of the proposal is <br /> generally unattainable. (Sec. 27-20(g)) <br /> Discussion of Effects to Farmers. Ranchers and other Acricultural Producers <br /> The immediate impact of the proposed ordinances to farmers and ranchers is <br /> unclear. Certainly, new farms and developments in West Hawaii would be put <br /> under the requirements of the new ordinances if passed. The requirement for <br /> existing operations to comply with the water retention requirement or mapping of <br /> the 100-year flood depth may overload the County engineering sections. It would <br /> be expected that permits for new structures or modifications to streams and <br /> watercourses would trigger the need for the flood management improvements on <br /> existing operations. <br /> Review and approval of Conservation Plans by the Soil and Water Conservation <br /> Districts (SWCDs) may require a review for compliance with the stormwater <br /> ordinances. Cooperators may opt out of their conservation plans if it triggered <br /> <br /> the need to install the proposed compliance measures. <br /> The requirement for 100-year flood capacity in watercourses may be interpreted <br /> <br /> to conflict with the NRCS capacity standards for water control structures. Until <br /> the effects of this change are more closely examined, it appears the size of these <br /> <br /> water control structures will increase in size in order to meet the capacity <br /> requirements thereby possibly taking agricultural lands out of production. In <br /> addition, it is doubtful that the NRCS financial assistance programs will fund the <br /> additional costs to comply with the County requirements. Unless the County <br /> provides financial assistance to agricultural operators to meet this proposed <br /> requirement, the farmer will inevitably bear the burden for the additional costs <br /> and potential loss of productive agricultural lands. <br /> The additional costs to farmers and rancher imposed by compliance with the <br /> stormwater ordinances will add to the already difficult financial position of the <br /> <br /> agricultural producers brought on by higher energy and feed/nutrient costs. It is <br /> likely that many operations will not financially survive. The result of fewer <br /> <br /> farmers and ranchers will be higher food costs to the public, less food security for <br /> <br /> the state, and more open land brought onto the market for non-agricultural <br /> development. <br /> Discussion on the Process to Improve Floodolain Management <br /> <br />