My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0193.096 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 0193.096 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 12:50:18 AM
Creation date
5/8/2008 5:49:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
0193
Point
096
Author
Lawrence W. Boyd, PH.D.
Communications - Referred To
N/A
Document Relationships
BIL 060 Draft 04 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
COM 0193.000 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
During the 1970's, eleven states decriminalized mazijuana possession, as have a <br /> number of countries since.3 Currently thirteen states have decriminalized marijuana <br /> , possession. Proponents of decriminalization argue that it can have positive outcomes that <br /> include savings on enforcement for state and local governments, an improved allocation <br /> of criminal justice resources, and expanded funding for prevention education and <br /> treatment for marijuana users. Opponents have claimed that decriminalization produces a <br /> substantial increase in marijuana use along with increased crime and other negative <br /> effects. <br /> Those who favor legalization point to the inefficient use of social resources and azgue <br /> that policies like those involved in the regulation of alcohol and tobacco are far more <br /> effective in limiting the individual and social costs involved. There is also a significant <br /> literature that suggests legalization could also be more efficient in limiting the negative <br /> consequences of marijuana use. Taxation, for example, can ameliorate whatever social <br /> costs occur, and the price effects can significantly reduce its use, especially among <br /> adolescents a Furthermore it can be demonstrated that taxation is significantly cheaper in <br /> terms of enforcement and outcomes than outlawing substances. <br /> This report reviews evidence and literature that suggest marijuana decriminalization <br /> would not lead to a measurable increase in marijuana use. This report does not take a <br /> - stance on whether, or not, mazijuana use is harmful. The conclusion reached below is that <br /> decriminalization would save state and local governments in Hawaii approximately $5 <br /> 3 Alaska, California, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, New York, North <br /> - Carolina, Ohio and Oregon decriminalized. Alaska (1990) voted to recriminalize, but <br /> Alaska's state courts have ruled that privacy rights protected marijuana use in the home. <br /> A twelfth state, South Dakota decriminalized and then recriminalized within a year. In <br /> 1996 Oregon recriminalized, but in 1998 voters rescinded recriminalization and returned <br /> to decriminalization. Nevada decriminalized in 2001. Colorado has also decriminalized. <br /> See http://www.norml.or¢/ and http://www.dru~policy.org/ for details. Countries that <br /> ~ have decriminalized aze Italy, Spain, Portugal, Luxembourg, Belgium, and Austria. <br /> Several other countries have either de facto decriminalized or are in the process of <br /> decriminalizing. These include Netherlands, Germany, Denmark, France, Switzerland, <br /> United Kingdom and Canada. See http://eldd.emcdda.orel. <br /> n See Becker, G. S., M. Grossman, et al. (1994). "An Empirical Analysis of Cigarette <br /> Addiction." American Economic Review 88(3): 396-418. They find prices have a greater <br /> effect on adolescents. <br /> 2 <br /> <br /> rr <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.