My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0032.035 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 0032.035 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2008 4:16:05 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 6:08:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
0032
Point
035
Author
Harry Kim, Mayor
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Council: Close file - 9/19/07
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2007/09/19 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Council
COM 0032.000 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECOMMENDATION <br />The Planning Director gives an unfavorable recommendation on the bill proposing a ban <br />on superstores. If the Council would like to give closer scrutiny to such stores because of traffic <br />or other impacts, the Planning Director proposes an alternative approach: that the Zoning Code <br />be amended so that a superstore is a permitted use only in a "Superstore" zoning district. In other <br />words, to establish a superstore, the business would have to rezone an area to the "Superstore" <br />zone; it could not just open up in an MCX, CG, or other zone. <br />The proposed superstore ban prompted a great deal of public testimony pro and con at the <br />Council, much of it focused specifically on Wal-Mart. This corporation has been controversial for <br />a number of reasons, including anti-union practices, wages, poor health benefits, relationships <br />with foreign suppliers and treatment of foreign workers, and its impact on small-town businesses. <br />Although the proposed bill itself does not single out any one corporation by name, because so <br />much public testimony was directed at Wai-Mart, it may be useful to explain some general rules <br />for the benefit of the public. <br />The land use system focuses on what should happen on a particular piece of property, <br />where certain uses should take place, how the uses should be done (for example, design controls <br />or parking requirements), but is concerned with who is doing the project only to a very limited <br />degree. Section 25-2-10 of the Zoning Code states that approvals run with the land and "shall not <br />be granted if the action sought would not be equally acceptable under a variety of owners." This <br />is the general rule in American land use law. There are limited circumstances where the identity <br />of the applicant may be relevant: for example, the State Land Use Commission has, at times, <br />required proof that the applicant has the financial ability to carry out a project to avoid purely <br />speculative applications, but the general rule is still that the decisions shall not be made on the <br />basis of who is the applicant. <br />Much public testimony was given on the topic of competition and the potential effect of <br />superstores on existing businesses. Generally, business competition is regarded as a good thing: in <br />fact, essential to the current economic system. It is inherent in business competition that some <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.