Laserfiche WebLink
Disability <br /> v Rights <br /> Hawaii P.O. Box 5575, Hilo, HI 967211 (808) 9613862 <br /> working rogetherfor access <br /> 8/21/2007 <br /> <br /> Hawaii County Councilmembers <br /> <br /> Dear Councilmembers, <br /> This is a followup letter to our letter of 8/10/07 regazding Bill 151 and the new <br /> provisions that require raising the floors of new construction. It is on behalf of the Boazd of <br /> Directors of Disability Rights Hawaii, which has approved the previous letter (written on <br /> behalf of our Visitability Task Force). We oppose the measures to require higher elevation <br /> of the floors of new homes. We cannot support a rule that allows the creation of increasingly <br /> inaccessible buildings. Our society needs to increase accessibility, not decrease it. If <br /> building elevations must be increased, then the entrances to those buildings must be required <br /> to be accessible to people with mobility impairments. <br /> We understand Bill 151 to require higher floors unless owners finance a survey to <br /> prove that they are not in a flood azea (the implication of "non-shaded X zone"). The <br /> expense of the surveys will virtually guazantee that most homes will be built higher off the <br /> ground than they are now. This is a serious harm to people with mobility impairments. The <br /> creation of more inaccessible buildings increases the segregation that is already experienced <br /> by citizens with mobility impairments. <br /> The authors of this bill are awaze that it will harm the interests of people with <br /> mobility impairments. But they never bothered to inform disabled citizens of their plan. <br /> Why were we being kept in the dazk about this important erosion of our rights? <br /> Our society needs to increase the abilities of its citizens to live in the community <br /> throughout their lifetimes. A very large proportion of elderly people become mobility <br /> impaired. If their own houses were built to be accessible, they would be able to live <br /> independently at home rather than being locked into an institution. By requiring higher <br /> elevations, Bill 151 reduces the number of accessible new homes, and thereby reduces the <br /> possibility that elderly people will be able to live independently. <br /> We need improvements in accessible construction, not increases in the barriers that <br /> keep people with mobility impairments out of homes. DRH is trying to educate the public to <br /> the need for all homes to be accessible, not only the homes of people who happen to have <br /> mobility impairments. The idea that only the homes of disabled people need to be accessible <br /> is simple bigotry. Like everyone else, people with mobility impairments deserve to have <br /> access to the community. <br /> Comm: No. <br /> Ref. Toat,~~ <br /> Ref. DoteAUG <br /> 2_ <br /> ~2 <br /> Z_ pp7 <br /> Disability Rights Hawaii is atax-exempt nonpro&t mrporadan <br /> <br />