Laserfiche WebLink
a•.M <br /> LAND USE RESEARCH ' <br /> FOUNDATION OF HAWAII <br /> 70o Bishop Street, Ste. t928 <br /> Honolulu, Hawaii g68t3 <br /> Phone 52t-4717 <br /> Fax ~bor32 <br /> September 9, 2007 <br /> <br /> The Honorable Pete Hoffman <br /> <br /> Council Chair 8 Presiding Officer <br /> and Members of the Hawaii County Council <br /> <br /> 333 Kilauea Avenue, 2"" Flaor Council Room <br /> Hilo, Hawaii 96720 counciitestimonv(a~co.hawaii.hi.us <br /> RE: Bill 151, Draft 2, Amendment to Chapter 27, Flood Control, Hawaii County <br /> Code 1983 (2005 Edfion, as Amended) <br /> Dear Chair Hoffman and Council Members, <br /> My name is David Arakawa, 6cecutive Director of the Land Use Research Foundation of <br /> Hawaii ("LURE°), a private, Wort-profd research and trade association whose members <br /> include major Hawaii landowners, devebpers and a utility company. One of LURF's <br /> missions is to advocate for reasonable and rational land use planning, legislation and <br /> regulation affecting common problems in Hawaii, such as housing, development, and <br /> transportation. <br /> LURE supports flood control legislation which is based on federal and state <br /> requirements, and would also support additional requirements which are based on <br /> scientific or engineering principles, practices and considerations. However, in the <br /> case, we must express our strong opposition to Bill 151, which is based on the following: <br /> • Bill 151 includes addiRional arbitrary requirements which are not based on <br /> scientfcc or engineering principles, practices and considerations; <br /> • The additional arbitrary requirements far exceed the requirements of the <br /> National Flood Insurance Program ("NFIP")and other federel and state <br /> requirements; <br /> • The additional arbitrary requirements will result in additional costs and will be <br /> passed on and could result in price increases too high for Hawaii County <br /> residents who are first-time home buyers. <br /> • The additional arbitrary requirements restrict the use of private property; and <br /> • The additional arbitrary requirements thus constitute an unconstitutional taking <br /> of land." <br /> Comm: S g 22 <br /> Ref. To: Prat <br /> Ref. Dote SEP R 9RfF7 1 <br /> <br />