Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Pete Hoffmann, Chairman <br /> and Members of the County Council <br /> Page 2 <br /> <br /> right across Kilauea Avenue from a Medium and High Density Urban area. The Director <br /> interprets Kilauea Avenue as a hard, impenetrable line between Low and Medium <br /> Density Urban, sharply and immovably separating them on a lot-specific basis. In the <br /> Director's view, if your lot is on one or the other side of the street, this largely determines <br /> your rezoning potential, specifically lot by lot. <br /> <br /> The Commission carefully considered the Director's recommendation, along with <br /> <br /> the nature of the surrounding LUPAG map designations, the General Plan's policies and <br /> objectives, and the trend of existing uses. The General Plan itself states plainly that the <br /> LUPAG map is not intended to draw hard, lot-specific lines. It is only a general guide. <br /> "The land use pattern is a broad, flexible design intended to guide the direction and <br /> quality of future developments in a coordinated and rational manner. The General Plan <br /> Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map indicates the general locations of <br /> various land uses in relation to each other." (General Plan p. 14-7). Nowhere in the <br /> General Plan is it mandated that streets that happen to be used as LUPAG district <br /> boundaries are to be used as hard lot-specific zoning restrictions. The LUPAG map is <br /> clearly a general guide, leaving the final zoning decision in the legislative discretion of <br /> the Council. <br /> <br /> This is especially important in this case. Here, the record reflects that the subject <br /> property is right on the LUPAG Map boundary between Low and Medium designated <br /> areas. Directly across the street is designated Medium Density. This lot could not be any <br /> closer to Medium Density without actually being in it. It is just such lots on the margin <br /> which should be eligible for legislative zoning discretion. <br /> <br /> Such discretion should be applicable particularly where the proposed uses also fall <br /> within the margin of permitted uses between designations. There is a considerable overlap <br /> between the types of commercial uses allowable in both Low and Medium Density Urban <br /> areas. Significantly, the General Plan provides that "neighborhood commercial" uses are <br /> allowed in both Low and Medium Density Urban areas. The subject Low Density area <br /> also allows for "convenience-type" commercial uses (General Plan p. 14-7). The GP <br /> doesn't define "neighborhood" or "convenience" commercial uses. However, the Zoning <br /> Code in "Neighborhood Commercial" ("CN") zones, allows "personal services" <br /> including "beauty shops." (HCC 25-5-102(a)(27); 25-1-5). So the proposed beauty shop <br /> is arguably within the general range of "neighborhood commercial" uses consistent with <br /> Low or Medium Density LUPAG designation. <br /> <br /> Ironically, the Planning Department noted that if a convenience store were being <br /> requested, that may be allowable for a rezoning to CN-20. The volume of traffic and <br />