My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1067.000 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 1067.000 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2009 3:36:02 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 7:09:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
1067
Point
000
Author
Brenda Ford, Councilmember
Communications - Referred To
PWIRC
Comments
PWIRC-63: Recommends passage of Bill 262 on first reading 3/11/08; Council: Bill 262 passes first reading; adopts PWIRC-63 - 3/25/08
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 2008/03/25 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Council
AGE PWIRC 03/11/2008 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Public Works & Intergovernmental Relations Committee (PWIRC)
BIL 262 Draft 01 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Bills\2006-2008
COM 1067.001 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
COM 1067.008 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2006-2008
REP PWIRC 063 03/11/2008 2006-2008
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2006-2008\Public Works & Intergovernmental Relations Committee (PWIRC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> 02/28/2008 08:20 3265697 KCO PAGE 08 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> I Chapter 8 <br /> RepuWag Stmidards for Performance <br /> Audits <br /> <br /> <br /> i <br /> <br /> zesponsible officials of the audited entl and the <br /> corrective actions they plan to take. Obtaining the <br /> comments in writing is preferred, but oral comm¢nta are <br /> acceptable. <br /> <br /> ' 8.33 When auditors receive written comments from the <br /> responsible officials, they should include in their report <br /> a copyof the officials' written comments, or a summary <br /> ' of the comments received. When the responsible <br /> officials provide oral comments only, auditors should <br /> ' prepare a summary of the oral comments and provide a <br /> copy of the summary to the responsible officials to <br /> verify that the comments are accurately stated. <br /> <br /> 8.34 Auditors should also include in the report an <br /> evaluation of the comments, as appropriate- In cases in <br /> I which the audited entity provides technical comments in <br /> addition rn its written or oral comments on the report, <br /> auditors may disclose in the report that such comments <br /> were received. <br /> 8.36 Obtaining oral comments may be appropriate <br /> when, for example, there is a reporting date critical to <br /> meeting a user's needs; auditors have worked closely <br /> I with the responsible officials throughout the conduct of <br /> the work and the parties are familiar with the findings <br /> and issues addressed in the draft report; or the auditors <br /> ' do not expect major disagreements with the findings, <br /> conclusions, and recommendations in the draft report, <br /> or m.ajor controversies with regard to the issues <br /> ' discussed in the draft report. <br /> <br /> ' 8.36 When the audited entity's comments are <br /> inconsistent or in conflict with the findings, conclusions, <br /> or recommendations in the draft report, or when <br /> planned corrective actions do not adequately address <br /> the auditors' recommendations, the auditors should <br /> evaluate LLe valitlit.y of the audited entity's comments. If <br /> 1 the auditors disagree with the comments, they should <br /> <br /> Page 170 GAO-07-731G Government Auditing Standards <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.