Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Assessment Criteria Form <br /> <br /> The 2007 Assessment Criteria Form (see Appendix 6) was the same form used in <br /> developing the 2007 Prioritized List for the 2006 Annual Report as well as for this 2007 Annual <br /> Report. This assessment criteria form was previously revised August 14, 2006 and updated with <br /> r minor changes on February 12, 2007. The Commission members individually assessed these <br /> properties utilizing this 2007 Assessment Criteria Form. These individual scores were totaled <br /> and then divided by the number of assessments submitted by commissioners to derive the <br /> r average final score % for each property. These scores are outlined in the 2007 Comprehensive <br /> List (see Appendix 7). <br /> w <br /> ,W Prioritized List <br /> <br /> The 2007 Prioritized List is as follows: <br /> +r <br /> Priority <br /> Number Property Score <br /> Y <br /> 1 Pa`o`o 91% <br /> ` 2 Kukuipahu-Ha`ena Corridor 88% <br /> 3 Mahukona Historical Area 86% <br /> 4 Kaiholena 83% <br /> 5 `O`oma II 73% <br /> rr <br /> Details of these properties (obtained from the suggestion forms submitted by the public) <br /> are summarized in Appendix 2. <br /> w. <br /> In developing the 2007 Prioritized List for this Annual Report, the Commission examined <br /> those properties that were assessed with an average final score of 70% or more. In addition, <br /> those properties from the previously submitted "Prioritized List - Lands and/or Property <br /> Entitlements for Acquisition" dated December 27, 2006 (see Appendix 8) were re-examined and <br /> also considered for this Prioritized List in order to maintain some continuity in this process. <br /> <br /> This year, the Commission chose not to include properties that had resolutions already <br /> +r passed by the Hawaii County Council authorizing the Director of Finance to enter into <br /> negotiations for acquisition. The resolutions for these property acquisitions are attached as <br /> Appendix 9. <br /> r <br /> Commission and Community Concerns <br /> <br /> The following is a listing of concerns and problems identified by the Commission: <br /> <br /> ? A priority adjustment ranking mechanism should be developed, in consultation with the <br /> ~r Mayor, to guide the meshing of newly developed priority property lists with lists <br /> submitted in previous years. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> -3- <br /> rr <br />