Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> GMO Position (page 2) <br /> <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, while it is recognized that the Kona Coffee Farmers Association has no regulatory authority <br /> nor scientific competence to regulate the release and development of GM crops, the KCFA may <br /> legitimately respond to the concerns of farmers and others with a stake in the future of Kona's gourmet <br /> coffee industry, and may further express such concerns to those agencies and institutions responsible for <br /> the development, permitting, oversight and regulation of GM crops. <br /> <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE KONA COFFEE FARMERS ASSOCIATION, that <br /> the Kona Coffee Farmers Association opposes the introduction of genetically modified coffee plants into <br /> the state of Hawaii and requests the following: <br /> <br /> 1. A moratorium on the release of genetically modified coffee plants into the state of Hawaii until a <br /> regulatory regime has been adopted that includes extensive evaluation of genetic contamination from <br /> pollen drift and other environmental consequences and secondary ecological effects. <br /> <br /> 2. A statute, regulation, and/or rule that liability for any external costs to individuals and the environment <br /> caused by physical spillover effects, such as genetic contamination from pollen drift, must be bome by the <br /> growers, manufacturers and distributors of genetically engineered plants. <br /> <br /> 3. In conjunction with the establishment of an adequate regulatory regime as outlined in item (1) above, a <br /> requirement that genetically modified plantings to be explicitly labeled as such, and neighboring <br /> properties notified--the costs of such labeling and notification to be borne by the owner or lessee of the <br /> planted land. <br /> <br /> 4. A requirement that any coffee produced from genetically modified plants to be explicitly labeled as <br /> such at every stage of its production through to sale to provide adequate information to processors and <br /> consumers--the costs of such labeling and verification to be borne by the growers and processors of the <br /> genetically modified coffee. <br /> <br /> Ken Sheppard - President <br /> January 2007 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> RATIONALE BEHIND OUR POSITION <br /> Will GM Coffee grown in Hawaii affect Kona orchards? Yes, here's why... <br /> • The APHIS database (publicly available on the web) lists three projects of testing by UH. Of these, <br /> CTAHR's 'caffeine-free' plants on Oahu were destroyed in December 2000. Today CTAHR does not have <br /> any GMO coffee. HARC's are secured in a greenhouse on Oahu. In addition to these, there are GM <br /> experiments being done by Integrated Coffee Technologies (ICTI) that do not need to be listed on the <br /> database, as it only applies to field tests, not to lab work. ICTI now says it has plants ready to go into field <br /> tests in Spring 2008. Conceivably there could be more we do not know about. <br /> • Dr Bittenbender of UH reported to the HCA "If the current coffee genetic engineering program on nematode <br /> resistance advances to field testing then CTAHR and /or HARC may request a permit to test in a nematode <br /> infested field in Kona." The Kona coffee industry does not need to be consulted or notified when these field <br /> tests take place. USDA signs off on the permits for field tests, and they too have no structure in place to <br /> consult those who make their living from the crop. <br />