Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> YUEN: Thanks for correcting that. We'll make that change. Because that whole <br /> section of (c) (3) and (4) is not supposed to change, was not supposed to be changed at all, and it <br /> is In what you have before you, (c) (3) is put in wrong. <br /> <br /> SIRACUSA: So (3) is wrong. <br /> <br /> WATANABE: Yeah. <br /> <br /> YUEN: (c) (3) is wrong; should read differently <br /> <br /> SIRACUSA: Okay, but that's nothing that we are going to be voting on, right? We are <br /> not voting on anything to do with (3). <br /> YUEN: Right. There is no change intended to (c) (3); it's just that it was typed in <br /> wrong in the bill that you have in front of you. <br /> <br /> SIRACUSA: Okay, so it's irrelevant for our purposes. Then I go to my question then. <br /> <br /> WATANABE: Okay. <br /> <br /> SIRACUSA: Chris, and that is, suppose someone appeals, right? Is there a filing fee to <br /> appeal? <br /> <br /> YUEN: Two hundred fifty dollars, yes. <br /> <br /> SIRACUSA: Okay, I thought that was it, but I wasn't sure. Suppose the appellant wins <br /> the appeal, is their filing fee also reimbursed to them? <br /> <br /> YUEN: No. <br /> <br /> SIRACUSA: So even if they were right in the first place, and the Planning Department <br /> was wrong in issuing them the cease and desist and the violation notice, they still have to eat that <br /> fee. <br /> <br /> YUEN: Yes. <br /> <br /> WATANABE: That is <br /> <br /> SIRACUSA: That doesn't seem fair. <br /> <br /> WATANABE: That is May I comment? That is not uncommon within our system; if I <br /> were to sue you and it was a frivolous suit and you had to defend yourself and hire an attorney, <br /> and I basically didn't have any money, you couldn't get back it from me, either. So it sometimes <br /> costs you money to prove that you were right or innocent. <br /> <br /> DOMINGO: Or wrong. <br /> <br /> WATANABE: Yeah. <br /> <br /> 4 <br />