|
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br /> YUEN: That's correct, Ivan, right, that there is no provision for the return of the
<br /> filing fee in the ordinance?
<br />
<br /> TORIGOE: I'm trying to recall if I have some vague recollection that in certain
<br /> circumstances when one might be able to, but I can't remember if it was just like a, you know,
<br /> poverty situation or something like that. We don't have the Board of Appeals Rules, do we?
<br />
<br /> SIRACUSA: It just seems like, if the Planning Department, for example, was acting
<br /> frivolously, you know, not saying that you would or you do, but you know, you are not going to
<br /> be the only Planning Director in the world, and the person really was innocent all along and, you
<br /> know, where he's shown to be right, it seems that they shouldn't have to bear that cost. After all,
<br /> to use Rodney's example, if somebody were to sue me for something and I have to defend
<br /> myself, you know, then 1 could always have the option of suing them for court costs and
<br /> attorney's fees, that sort of thing, right, so, to get back what I needed to defend myself.
<br /> WATANABE: It's not uncommon
<br />
<br /> ALAMEDA: Mr. Chair?
<br />
<br /> WATANABE: But then again, you know, what you are discussing, I believe is potentially
<br /> a separate amendment, to another section?
<br />
<br /> SIRACUSA: Because I do support this; I do think we need some teeth here to close the
<br /> loophole where some really ugly and possibly even hazardous violations are taking place. But at
<br /> the same time, it seems like if somebody is found to be innocent or not in violation at the very
<br /> least, it shouldn't cost them money to have to
<br />
<br /> WATANABE: Well, on the other hand, it may be like I
<br />
<br /> SIRACUSA: I mean it cost them money in the first place when they file their appeal;
<br /> but they should be at least be able to recover that
<br />
<br /> WATANABE: I understand where you are headed. But it may be in a different statute
<br /> and a separate amendment that would be required, yeah? And so I'm not sure if we want to go
<br /> there right at this moment. Mr. Woodward.
<br />
<br /> WOODWARD: Yes, Mr. Chairman. I seem to remember, because I did actually appeal a
<br /> property tax increase; and my recollection was that if you were successful, that they would
<br /> refund your filing fee. But that's honestly neither here nor there because we are not voting on
<br /> that. We are voting on what we are going to do; these are going to be the Board of Appeals
<br /> rules, and we have no jurisdiction in that regard. So whether or not it's fair and what they do,
<br /> that's really not something for us to consider. We have to consider what we need to do. And as
<br /> I pointed out at the last meeting when we discussed this, you know, if the IRS sends you a bill,
<br /> says you owe more taxes, and you file an appeal to Tax Court, you still have to pay the money.
<br /> And you know, if you are successful, you get it back. And that's the way it ought to be here. I
<br /> mean there is no reason to give people a chance to escape just because they file an appeal. So I
<br />
<br />
<br /> 5
<br />
|