REP PC 020 01/22/2003 2002-2004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Communication 60 Bill 17 Page 5 then stated that he will not "vote against the previous determinations of the Planning Directors that this was, although not mapped as such, it was part of the High Density area in the General Plan." Mr. Yuen also explained that if the subject parcel were to be subdivided now, the applicant would not be able to get subdivision approval within the floodway. Mr. 'Cyler then quoted the t'harter in saying, °No public improvement project or subdivision or zoning ordinance shall be initiated or adopted unless the same conforms to and implements the General Plan." He then reiterated that. "IPs impossible for us to approve this, I don't care how many conditions we have on iL because it violates the General Plan." Committee Member Aaron Chung argued that although the subject property lies directly in the flood plain, mitigating measures can be taken to remedy the situation so the applicant could develop a part of the lot. Director Chris Yuen then suggested that the following DO"f conditions be included in Bill No. 17 as a means, so if there were any modifications to them, the Council would have the final say: 1. that the direct access be a right-in/right-out design 2. that the direct access be located as far as possible to the Volcano side of the property 3. that the right-turn deceleration lane into Puainako Street tcom Kanoelehua Avenue be extended 4. that aright-turn deceleration lane on Kanoelehuea Avenue into the development he provided 5. that the Icft-turn from Puainako Street into the development be prohibited 6. that the development's Puainako access be right-in/right-out onl~~ 7. that the Puainako access be located as far as possible away from Kanoelehua Avenue 8. that the traffic controls, i.e. possible signs and pavement markings. on Kanoelehua Avenue be provided to prohibit traffic exiting the development from crossing Kanoelehua Avenue to head west on Puainako 9. that other engineering and design parameters he considered. He also suggested that the final three DO'f conditions he included: 1. Matsuno Enterprises will be subject to a fee for the enhanced value of the property due to the new Kanoelehua access 2. A Traffic Impact Analysis Report ("LIAR) for the development will be required. Should the I~IAK indicate that the development contributes to the need Ibr future improvements to the Puainako Street/Kanoelehua Avenue Intersection. Matsuno lnterprises will pay its fair share for the improvements 3. Matsuno Enterprises will be responsihle for the cost of all tral7ic control adjustments needed as a result of granting of the Kanoelehua access.