|
Environmental Mgmt 253,804 354,623 785,229 430,606
<br />Transfers to Other Funds 7,605,908 8,040,191 10,513,725 2,473,534
<br />Transfer to Debt Svc 21,421,924 23,589,685 23,921,138 331,453
<br />Pensions & Contribs 21,154,811 26,812,600 31,715,400 4,902,800
<br />Miscellaneous 3,950,731 5,329,000 5,432,000 103,000
<br />Block Grants 2,908,747 -
<br />Home Grants 673,481 -
<br />Housing Grants 250,000 -
<br />General Fund 178,365,249 193,879,375 15,514,126
<br />Expenditures
<br />Highway Fund 15,076,933 17,591,245 23,853,188 6,261,943
<br />Sewer Fund 5,000,252 7,895,905 7,430,663 (465,242)
<br />Cemetery Fund 16,000 16,000 16,000 -
<br />Bikeway Fund 1,751 181,000 181,000 -
<br />Beautifcation Fund 53,833 200,000 215,000 15,000
<br />Vehicle Disposal Fund 565,508 1,680,200 1,716,200 36,000
<br />Solid Waste Fund 11,324,950 12,626,032 17,425,252 4,799,220
<br />Golf Course Fund 970,300 1,007,786 988,304 (19,482)
<br />Geothermal Rel Rev Fund - 150,000 150,000 -
<br />Housing Fund 11,265,933 12,312,488 14,428,348 2,115,860
<br />Kulaiman Elderly Hsg Fund 227,397 406,900 457,800 50,900
<br />Ouli Ekahi Hsg Fund 145,891 245,560 248,026 2,466
<br />Geothermal Asset Fund 2,013 50,000 50,000 -
<br />TTL Fund Expenditures
<br />Less:lnterfund Transfers
<br />Net Expenditures
<br />232,728,365 261,039,156 28,310,791
<br />11,642,302 14,442,336 2,800,034
<br />221,086,063 246,596,820 25,510,757
<br />121.43
<br />30.76
<br />1.41
<br />18.29
<br />1.93
<br />8.70
<br />35.60
<br />(5.89)
<br />7.50
<br />2.14
<br />38.01
<br />(1.93)
<br />17.18
<br />12.51
<br />1.00
<br />12.16
<br />24.05
<br />11.54
<br />The following recommendations were brought forward for consideration by the administration in
<br />Draft 2 of the Operating Budget for F'Y2004-05:
<br />• Reflect a decrease in revenues to the Fuel Tax Increase account in lieu of the indefinite
<br />postponement of Resolution No. 173-04 by the Committee on Finance.
<br />• Reflcet an increase in revenues to the Vehicle and Trailer Weight Tax account with the
<br />passage of Bill No. 260, which proposed to increase the annual vehicle weight tax for
<br />passenger vehicles, small trucks and noncommercial vehicles from '/z cent per pound to'/a
<br />cent per pound, and for trucks and commercial vehicles from 1 cent per pound to 2 cents
<br />per pound effective January 1, 2005. {NOTE: No vote was taken by the Council to
<br />determine the desirable use of additional weight tax revenues re: county laborer positions
<br />vs. private contract paving.;
<br />• Exclude funding associated with the proposed sort station until the County has clarified
<br />its direction with respect to waste reduction technology.
<br />4
<br />
|