My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 1282.000 2006-2008
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2006-2008
>
COM 1282.000 2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2008 10:49:53 AM
Creation date
6/9/2008 3:52:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2006-2008
Communication
1282
Point
000
Author
Colleen Schrandt, Legislative Auditor
Communications - Referred To
PWIRC
Comments
PWIRC: Close File - 6/17/08
Document Relationships
AGE PWIRC 06/17/2008 2006-2008
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2006-2008\Public Works & Intergovernmental Relations Committee (PWIRC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER 1 AUDIT STANDARDS AND PLAN <br />Government Auditing Standards -The Yellow Book <br />In his introductory letter issuing the July 2007 revision of "Government Auditing Standards" <br />(commonly referred to as the "Yellow Book"), U. S. Comptroller General David Walker stated: <br />"The principles of transparency and accountability for the use of public resources are key to our <br />nation's governing processes. Government officials ... are responsible for carrying out public <br />functions efficiently, economically, effectively, ethically, and equitably, while achieving desired <br />program objectives. High-quality auditing is essential for government accountability to the <br />public and transparency regarding linking resources to related program results. Auditing of <br />government programs should provide independent, objective, fact-based, nonpartisan <br />assessments of the stewardship, performance and cost of government policies, programs, and <br />operations. Government audits also provide key information to stakeholders and the public to <br />maintain accountability; help improve program performance and operations; reduce costs; <br />facilitate decision making; stimulate improvements; and identify current and projected <br />crosscutting issues and trends that affect government programs and the people those programs <br />serve." <br />Risk Assessment and Audit Plan <br />In accordance with the foregoing Yellow Book standards, the Legislative Auditor initiated a <br />County-wide risk assessment process in FY 2006-2007. The risk assessment process included <br />input from County executives and department managers and County Council members on more <br />than 30 risk criteria. The purpose of the risk assessment was to provide a standardized, objective <br />mechanism to determine which specific County departments, programs or activities present the <br />greatest "business risk," or the likelihood that events or circumstances will occur that will <br />prevent departments, programs or activities from attaining their purpose, goals and objectives in <br />an effective and efficient manner. The purpose of this limited scope performance audit is to <br />provide an independent objective opinion as to whether "business risks" relating to CIP contract <br />modifications are being managed or reduced to an acceptable level. <br />Based on results of the FY 2006-2007 County-wide risk assessment, the Legislative Auditor <br />developed an audit plan that was presented to the County Council on August 1, 2007, as <br />Communication No. 580, which ranked the Department of Public Works first for review. <br />Audit Scope and Methodology <br />When considering which DPW responsibilities and activities should be reviewed, we considered <br />risks common to public works projects such as significant reliance on third-party contractors, <br />insufficient segregation of duties of government staff, and recent industry-wide scrutiny of <br />abuse, collusion and/or fraud in the award and management of public works contracts. <br />Based upon this preliminary analysis, the Legislative Auditor's Office conducted a limited scope <br />performance audit of the Department of Public Works' practices, policies, and procedures <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.