Laserfiche WebLink
Mitigation should be commensurate with the impact of the project. In this case, <br />the projected traffic is small: the TIAR expects that during the period when all traffic <br />uses Alii Drive, it would only increase traffic on Alii Drive by about 5%. <br />The concurrency ordinance also provides that the Planning Director shall give <br />options to the council on how concurrency can be achieved. In this situation, there are <br />several possible alternatives: <br />Alternative 1: The draft Kona Community Development Plan proposes a <br />connector road in the vicinity of this property, that would provide a mauka-makai <br />connection between Alii Drive and the Kahului-Keauhou Parkway. The alignment of the <br />connector is conceptual in the draft CDP, and is shown on the boundary between this <br />property and the KIC property to the south. See Exhibit 18. The eventual connection to <br />the Parkway would be on KIC property. The Parkway plans originally had an <br />intersection at Makolea St., about .6 miles to the south, but this had to be eliminated <br />because of the burial issue near this intersection. The result is that unless there is another <br />connection as shown in the CDP, there would be no connection between Alii Drive and <br />the Kahului - Keauhou Parkway between the Keauhou Shopping Center and La'aloa <br />Ave., a distance of about 1.8 miles. The conditions of zoning would allow this to be built <br />as a minor or local street, rather than as a collector, because it would be just one of a <br />network of streets eventually providing access between Alii Drive and the Kahului - <br />Keauhou Parkway. The difficulty for the applicant with Alternative 1 is that it cannot <br />connect to Alii Drive without access through property it does not currently own. <br />Alternative 2: the applicant could provide improvements to Alii Drive, <br />specifically, a left turn lane at the Queen Kalama/Alii Drive intersection. <br />Alternative 3: the applicant could provide twice the affordable housing normally <br />required under Chap. 11. In this case, the applicant would still be required to make some <br />improvements to the Queen Kalama/Alii Drive intersection because of safety and traffic <br />flow issues. <br />Alternative 4: the applicant could wait for occupancy until funds have been <br />committed for Phase I of the Kahului - Keauhou Parkway. Although Kuakini might still <br />be at LOS "E", the TIAR projects traffic on the Kahului - Keauhou Parkway to be at LOS <br />"D" in 2016, hence adequate under the concurrency standards. In this case, the applicant <br />-5- <br />