Laserfiche WebLink
a follow-up to Mayor Harry Kim's request in opening up the process to the public and have the <br />discussions done in a legitimate and transparent way. The recommendation is a very important <br />initiative that the mayor recommends and shows a partnership between the County Council and <br />the Administration on an issue that is very important to the well-being of our whole island and <br />toward the stabilization of our economy. He asked for all council members' support of the <br />commission. <br />Councilman Jacobson expressed support for the resolution and he is pleased Councilman Pilago <br />came forward with it. He is just hoping it will produce the desired effects, because all the people <br />who opposed the GMO ban bill--he talked with them and asked if they had any sympathy for the <br />people who have been put out of business by GMO contamination ofcrops--did not express any <br />sympathy for farmers with GMO contaminated crops. <br />Councilman Ikeda said he supports the resolution, but he wonders if the commission is after-the- <br />fact, because the Council already passed a GMO ban on coffee and taro. The mayor vetoed the <br />ban, but Councilman Ikeda would like to know how the commission affects the ban, the <br />subsequent veto, etc. <br />Councilman Pilago said the GMO commission does not affect the GMO ban ordinance as it <br />stands, and the issue of the veto is something that will be addressed later. Everyone agrees the <br />commission issue could have come up earlier, and the discussion format and public debate could <br />have occurred in a different way. Councilman Pilago said it's unfortunate the GMO ban <br />veto/commission came about in this fashion, but everyone needs to understand that there was <br />always the opportunity for this commission to be formed at an earlier time at an earlier period. <br />Councilman Pilago said he supports the mayor's desire for a commission, although it comes up <br />late for everyone. It should re-enforce the discussion for taro, coffee and papaya. Bringing the <br />discussion up in the public format is important for all of us, Councilman Pilago said. He does <br />not see a conflict between the commission and the GMO ban bill. <br />Councilwoman Brenda Ford supports the resolution with reservations since there are two groups <br />of people, one who wants GMO everything and a group led by the farming community who say <br />they don't want the ban on two products only. There doesn't seem to be a middle ground on this, <br />she noted. You have GMO coffee and taro, or you don't. The question Councilwoman Ford has <br />is who will decide who sits on the commission. Councilwoman Ford had a piece of testimony, <br />which all council members received, that she described as "extremely rude." The testimony <br />mentions the commission as "a place to discuss and understand the pros and cons of agricultural <br />biotechnology outside the rude and misinformed maelstrom of mainland funded activist <br />community." Councilwoman Ford doesn't believe there is anyone on the Council who voted for <br />the ban receiving any money on this issue. If so, she would like them to speak up because she <br />didn't receive any such money. It is that kind of person who shouldn't serve on the commission <br />because their mind is set in concrete, Councilwoman Ford said. They aren't willing to at least sit <br />down and have a rational discussion about the concerns of the farming community. <br />Councilwoman Ford is concerned about who selects the commission. Chairwoman Naeole said <br />it would be the mayor who would appoint members to the commission. Councilwoman Ford <br />expressed concern that it would be the mayor making the choice, when he has come out opposed <br />to the issue. <br />