Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and National Cooperative Highway Research Program <br /> (NCHRP). As part of our review of the adequacy of existing internal control systems, the audit also examines <br /> the implementation by the Highway Maintenance and Traffic Divisions of relevant measurable program and <br /> performance objectives to define and assess progress made toward meeting stated goals and standards for <br /> infrastructure condition and maintenance and road safety. <br /> Quoting from Government Auditing Standards: "Internal control comprises the plans, policies, methods and <br /> procedures used to meet the organization's mission, goals and objectives. Internal control includes the <br /> processes and procedures for planning, organizing, directing, and controlling program operations, and <br /> management's system for measuring, reporting, and monitoring program performance...." <br /> The audit period covers fiscal years 2006-2007 and 2007-2008. <br /> <br /> FINDINGS <br /> Our review of the operational activities of the Highway Maintenance and Traffic Divisions identified the failure <br /> of prior DPW Administrations to establish a proper "Tone at the Top", which requires the implementation of <br /> program goals that are supported by action plans directly linked to measurable program objectives and <br /> relevant performance measures. However, this finding is not unique to DPW, since County government as a <br /> whole has historically failed to establish a "Tone at the Top" that requires consistent outcome-based planning <br /> and budgeting for effective decision-making, maximization of resources, and regular performance reporting to <br /> the public it serves. DPW is also restricted by an annual Highway Fund allocation process that is based on a <br /> strict formula of road miles per District instead of an objective assessment of road conditions and traffic <br /> volumes, as well as an annual budget allocation process that is driven by Department, District, or high-profile <br /> projects instead of the economies gained by budgeting for preservation of existing assets and public safety <br /> through regularly scheduled infrastructure maintenance and safety improvement programs. <br /> DPW Administration and its Highway Maintenance and Traffic Divisions lack basic internal control systems to <br /> gather, analyze, and communicate information required to promote the effective and efficient utilization of <br /> Highway Fund revenues. They have collectively failed to establish, document, and communicate policies and <br /> procedures to clarify roles, responsibilities, and expectations within each Division and the Department; <br /> delineate the information and data needed to be collected and maintained; and establish formal processes for <br /> planning, scheduling, communicating, and coordinating infrastructure maintenance and safety improvement <br /> duties. DPW Administration and its Highway Maintenance and Traffic Divisions have not incorporated industry <br /> recommended standards and practices for road, bridge, and flood control maintenance and traffic safety <br /> programs. While it seems intuitive that the housing of the Highway Maintenance, Traffic, Engineering, and <br /> Building Divisions under the Department of Public Works is to facilitate communication and coordination of <br /> related duties, DPW management has historically permitted the perpetuation of a culture of autonomous units <br /> and lacked the leadership and oversight required to implement the fundamental framework for planning, <br /> communicating, coordinating, and assessing.the complex and critical tasks for which the Department of Public <br /> Works is responsible. <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> In the report, we offer recommendations to the Highway Maintenance and Traffic Divisions and DPW <br /> Administration specifically relating to their Highway Fund activities, as well as recommendations to the Mayor <br /> and Council in their capacities to set a new "Tone" for County government that will impact all County <br /> programs and operations, including those programs and operations supported by Highway Fund revenues. <br /> The recommendations relate to establishing internal controls, or essentially building a foundation or <br /> framework, to guide and direct County personnel charged with operational responsibilities for road, bridge, <br /> and flood control maintenance and safety programs that were established to fulfill the County's stated mission <br /> for the Highway Fund. <br /> Summarized below are the broader recommendations offered in the report: <br /> DPW Administration and Highway Maintenance and Traffic Divisions: <br /> o Immediately develop written policies and procedures for all activities and functions, including requirements <br /> for formal oversight, communication, and coordination within and between DPW Administration and its <br /> Divisions, other County departments, State and federal agencies, and private utility providers, consultants, <br /> 2 <br />