My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
BIL 169 Draft 01 2008-2010
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Bills
>
2008-2010
>
BIL 169 Draft 01 2008-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2021 3:15:41 PM
Creation date
11/4/2009 10:23:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
BIL
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
2008-2010
Bill/Resolution
169
Draft
01
Introducer
Donald Ikeda, Council Member
Referred To
PC
Action 1
PC-52: Recommends passage of Bill 169 on first reading - 11/17/2009.
Action 2
Council: Bill 169 passes first reading; adopts PC-52 - 12/02/09
Action 3
Council: Bill 169 passes second & final reading - 12/16/09
Status
Adopted
Date To Mayor or Adoption Date
12/24/2009
Reading Number
1
Reading Date
12/2/2009
Ayes
9-Enriques;Ford;Greenwell;Hoffmann;Ikeda;Naeole-Beason;Onishi;Yagong;Yoshimoto
Noes
0
Absent
0
Excused
0
Reading Number .
2
Reading Date .
12/16/2009
Ayes .
8-Enriques;Ford;Greenwell;Hoffmann;Ikeda;Naeole-Beason;Onishi;Yoshimoto
Noes .
0
Absent .
1-Yagong
Excused .
0
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 12/02/2009 2008-2010
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2008-2010\Council
AGE COUNCIL 12/16/2009 2008-2010
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2008-2010\Council
AGE PC 11/17/2009 2008-2010
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2008-2010\Planning Committee (PC)
COM 0604.000 2008-2010
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\2008-2010
ORD 2009-161 2008-2010
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Ordinances\2009
ORD 2009-161 2008-2010
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Ordinances\2009
REP PC 052 11/17/2009 2008-2010
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2008-2010\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />degree of effort, and, in some cases, the inability to achieve a sufficient <br />consensus, has been the limiting factors. <br /> <br />The need for a Community Development Plan for a particular area should <br />be assessed considering a number of factors, including how much is public <br />infrastructure challenged by recent or anticipated growth and whether there are <br />significant efforts to change the zoning and land use in the area. <br /> <br />After the steering committee has recommended approval of the <br />Community Development Plan, it shall be forwarded to [the Planning <br />Commission] either the Windward or Leeward Planning Commission, or both <br />meeting as a ioint commission as provided for in the Hawai'i County Charter, for <br />[its] review and recommendation to the County Council. The County Council may <br />modify or amend the Community Development Plan before enacting it by <br />ordinance, but it shall give the steering committee and the designated Planning <br />Commission, or ioint commission, as the case may be, an opportunity to review <br />and comment upon substantive amendments and modifications before final <br />adoption of the plan. <br /> <br />In the process of creating the Community Development Plan, it may be <br />determined that the General Plan should be amended. The Planning Director or <br />County Council may initiate amendments to the General Plan, and the steering <br />committee may recommend amendments, that would be enacted at the same time <br />as the Community Development Plan, or as a follow-up to the Community <br />Development Plan. If there is a direct conflict between the Community <br />Development Plan and the General Plan, the General Plan shall be controlling. <br /> <br />The Community Development Plans shall focus on action. The courses of <br />action specified in each element of the General Plan need greater detail and need <br />to be coordinated by district. The Community Development Plans shall identify <br />appropriate governmental actions that include: <br /> <br />. Regulatory actions. Regulations rely on government's police power to <br />control what people can and cannot do in the interest of the public's health, safety, <br />or welfare. The County administers and enforces various regulations to control <br />land use. These regulations include the zoning code, subdivision code, flood <br />control code, grading code, sign code, and building code. The County also <br />administers requirements imposed by the Federal and State governments, such as <br />the Coastal Zone Management Act and the State Land Use Law. The Community <br />Development Plans shall recommend amendments as appropriate to the codes, <br />maps, or administration and enforcement. <br /> <br />. Incentive measures. Where regulatory controls are the government's <br />"sticks", incentives are the "carrots" to encourage certain actions. Too often, <br />regulation is the solution. Regulation can be restrictive, reactive, and divisive. <br />Incentive measures, on the other hand, can invite creative "win-win" solutions. <br /> <br />, (; , <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.