COM 0798.000 2008-2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

M Memo to the Plxwn,uv, Diaector March 29, 2010 Pate 3 of 3 On page 22, last paragraph, the TIAR indicates that there will be a LOS E during the a.m. peak hour of traffic. The paragraph also state -.s that the intersection will be "fully" channelized, however only a dedicated left turn lane is proposed. Similarly on page 24. the third paragraph states a "fully" channelized intersection. The conclusions on page 25 conflicts with the information provided in the body of the TIAR. On Figure 14B in the north bound direction on Komohana Street between Kukuau Street and Ponohawai Street there is a loss of 275 vehicles in the @.m� peak hour of traffic. Similarly 295 vehicles are lost between Ponohawai Street and Puu Nonu Place in the north bound direction. . . The TIAR states that in 2030, the project will extend Ponohawai Street to intersect Mohouli Street. Review of Figures 14 and 14B (2030) shows that the west bound through is projected to be 50(85) vehicles during the a.m.(p.m.) peak hour of traffic. Figures 13 and 13B (2020) shows the same movement as 35(80) vehicles during the a.m.(p-m.) peak hour. With the extension of Ponohawai Street to Mohouli Street, would there be a possibility of traffic being redirected from Mohouli Street to Ponohawai Street? The tables at the end of the TIAR indicate some movements will be operating at LOS E even with mitigation measures. We recommend a condition for the provision a revised TIAR be submitted similar to condition X of Ordinance No. 04-144 of the former University Terrace Project District. Questions may be referred to Kelly Gomes of our Engineering Division at ext. 8327. KG A o.;nq pt I ia.zii is an ijy i Op, apmut} E ro jdir un,f I jnpPo;a