Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />i <br />j <br />PUNA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN il I <br />PROPOSED AMENDMENTS or ., 'A <br />• Because Puna's subdivisions are so large and have few arterial streets, evacuation of <br />residents on short notice in the event a lava flow, earthquake, tsunami or hurricane is <br />a significant problem with serious consequences to public safety. The potential <br />problem worsens as subdivision lots continue to develop and no infrastructure <br />improvements are made. <br />• As more lots are developed, an increasing number of residents expect improved <br />infrastructure. The cumulative impact of widespread use of cesspools on the quality <br />of the aquifer and coastal waters is undetermined. Retrofitting infrastructure <br />improvements is expensive, and not all residents are willing to either bear the cost or <br />accept the transition from a "rural" setting to one that is more suburban. <br />• Because subdivision lots were sold in their undeveloped state rather than with <br />dwellings, development has occurred in an uneven, "leap -frog" pattern, which makes <br />it even more difficult to develop infrastructure and provide services to the population. <br />Residents often must make long trips to employment, schools, shopping and other <br />destinations to meet daily needs. <br />• While most of these subdivisions are on agricultural -zoned lands, the actual use of <br />developed lots is predominantly residential. As in -fill residential development <br />continues, it will be more difficult for existing small -lot agricultural uses to remain <br />viable due to complaints from neighbors about nuisance effects of agricultural <br />operations and potential increases in crop theft or vandalism. <br />• Lot development adversely impacts the native forest in an obvious way when an <br />entire lot is cleared of vegetative cover to make way for buildings and yards. But <br />clear -cutting and pin -to -pin grading and grubbing of lots has subtler impacts, as well, <br />such as: <br />— Openings in the forest promote the spread of invasive, non-native species. Non- <br />native plants affect the forests by changing the soil chemistry and increasing <br />shade, making it hard for native plants to compete and survive. <br />— Fragmenting the forest creates "edge" habitat that further accelerates the decline <br />of native organisms. <br />— Fragmentation also changes the microclimate of adjacent forest (i.e., increased <br />temperature and sunlight and decreased moisture in the understory), altering <br />growing regimes for plants and the suitability of nesting sites. <br />— Grading creates boggy areas devoid of vegetation, providing breeding habitat for <br />mosquitoes, a vector for avian malaria, which further threatens the native bird <br />population. <br />— Re -contouring of lots through grading and filling alters local drainage patterns <br />[�fes], affecting adjacent properties or rights-of-way. <br />— Lot grading can lead to the collapse of an underlying lava tube, which in turn may <br />expose a unique cave ecosystem or an ancient burial site or artifact. <br />1-5 <br />