My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
BIL 211 Draft 03 1996-1998
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Bills
>
1996-1998
>
BIL 211 Draft 03 1996-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2021 11:14:37 AM
Creation date
7/18/2011 11:27:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Bill/Resolution
Bill/Resolution - Type
BIL
Bill/Resolution - Council Term
1996-1998
Bill/Resolution
211
Draft
03
Introducer
J. Curtis Tyler, III, Council Member
Referred To
COUNCIL
Action 1
Presented: Council - 6/1/98
Action 2
Council: Passes Bill 211, Dr. 3, on first of three readings and adopts PC-105 - 6/1/98
Action 3
Council: Amends Bill 211, Draft 3 to Draft 4 - 6/16/98
Reading Number
1
Reading Date
5/6/1998
Ayes
8-Arakaki, Chung, Ray, Reynolds, Santangelo, Smith, Tyler, Yagong
Noes
0
Absent
1-Leithead-Todd
Excused
0
Document Relationships
COM 0760.003 1996-1998
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Communications\1996-1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNTY OF HAW ' :=i' STATE OF HAWAII <br />BILL NO. 211 <br />" y9 <br />(Draft 3) <br />ORDINANCE NO. <br />AN ORDINANCE TO INITIATE A CHARTER AMENDMENT OF THE HAWAII <br />COUNTY CHARTER (1991), RELATING TO THE PLANNING DIRECTOR, PLANNING <br />COMMISSION AND BOARD OF APPEALS. <br />BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII: <br />SECTION 1. Intent and Purpose. The current structure of appeals to agency actions in <br />the County of Hawaii is duplicative and conflicting. [With the] -Ttig proposed amendments[,] <br />will establish a more effective appeals system [can be established] while preserving the right to <br />appeal and a hearing [which is in accordance with] under Chapter 91, Hawaii Revised Statutes, <br />Administrative Procedures. Thug amendments will eliminate the existing conflict with Section <br />5-4.3 and Section 5-6.3 of the County Charter relating to the Planning Commission and the <br />Board of Appeals[, respectively, which states in part "The board shall hear and determine <br />appeals from the actions of the planning director and planning commission. "L <br />The amendments to the Charter would accomplish the following substantive changes: <br />1. The Planning Commission is eliminated from the variance and special exception <br />appeals process. Because variances are, by Charter, a discretionary action <br />decided by the Planning Director, the appeal should be made to the Board of <br />Appeals, where an agency hearing could then be held. <br />[2. The Board of Appeals is eliminated as the appellate body for quasi-judicial <br />decisions made by the Planning Commission. The Charter and the County Code <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.