BIL 211 Draft 03 1996-1998 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

intend that the Planning Commission should be the final decision-making agency for certain decisions. In accordance with this legislative intent, agency hearings pursuant to Chapter 91 should be held by the Planning Commission and appeals be made directly to the judicial courts. 3. In order to clearly separate the functions of the decision-making body and the appellate body, the Board of Appeals is placed for administrative purposes in the Office of the Corporation Counsel instead of the Planning Department.] In addition, the bill makes less significant changes to clarify and reinforce the following existing practices and mandates: 1. Includes'duties of the Planning Commission as those assigned [by state statute] 2. Reinforces that the Planning Commission will hold public hearings on any matter upon which [they] 11 must act. 3. Clarifies the kinds of matters which would be appealable from the administrative decisions of the Planning Director and the Chief Engineer. 4. [Underscores the preference for Board of Appeals members to have planning and construction expertise.] Conforms and simplifies the langoge to make it SECTION 2. Section 5-4.2 of the Hawaii County Charter (1991), relating to the Planning Director, is amended to read as follows: "Section 54.2. [Planning Director] Appointment and Removal. The planning director shall be appointed by the mayor, confirmed by the council and may -2-