My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0212.006 2010-2012
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2010-2012
>
COM 0212.006 2010-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2011 2:14:06 PM
Creation date
10/21/2011 8:12:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2010-2012
Communication
0212
Point
006
Author
Pete Hoffmann, Council Member
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Council: Close file - 11/02/11
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 11/02/2011 2010-2012
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2010-2012\Council
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RFP IFB RECYCLE REPORT <br />AS OF 12 OCT 2011 <br />1. Is it cheaper to place recyclable materials in the landfill? <br />- DEM presented updated figures (through 2010) to the Council on 15 <br />June that reflected the rates for the current 2 -Bin Recycling hauling <br />contract which was an average of $137 /ton. In addition to the hauling <br />cost, under a separate contract, the County pays a landfill diversion <br />payment for the recycled materials. The cost for the landfill diversion <br />varies by materials and decreases or increases depending on the value of <br />the recycled materials. This information is obtained from independent <br />publications and is reviewed quarterly. The estimated total rate for the 2- <br />Bin recycling program (hauling & diversion) is $175 /ton. The landfill <br />operating costs are approximately $130 /ton but do not include capital <br />costs like equipment, facilities, closure and post closure costs, estimated <br />to be millions. Managing solid waste costs money whether it is to build <br />and run a landfill, waste to energy facility, compost operation or to <br />recycle. It involves equipment, labor, management and overhead costs. <br />To only consider the value of recycling as compared to the cost to landfill <br />is not the complete picture. True, some of the recycling costs are offset by <br />the value of the commodities but in most cases, the value does not cover all <br />the cost of the recycling. For instance, the State HI5 program uses a <br />portion of the 6 cents per bottle to pay the recyclers. Also, the market <br />value of each commodity varies and fluctuates. The conclusion is that the <br />County does pay a premium to recycle. <br />2. Will the County reach the stated recycling goal of 80% in 2014? <br />- Not much of a chance regardless of the RFP IFB situation. <br />- However, very likely that the County's current recycling rate of 36% will <br />decline if the program is eliminated. In 2001, Hawaii County's recycling <br />rate was only 14 %, lagging behind most of the other Counties & the State <br />rate of 28 %. By 2004, the recycling rate had increased slightly to 16 %, the <br />lowest in the State. By 2006, the County's recycling rate had increased to <br />26% and hit the highest level in 2010 of 36 %, same as Maui, higher than <br />Kauai and below the State 40% recycling rate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.