My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0212.006 2010-2012
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2010-2012
>
COM 0212.006 2010-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2011 2:14:06 PM
Creation date
10/21/2011 8:12:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2010-2012
Communication
0212
Point
006
Author
Pete Hoffmann, Council Member
Communications - Referred To
COUNCIL
Comments
Council: Close file - 11/02/11
Document Relationships
AGE COUNCIL 11/02/2011 2010-2012
(Related To)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2010-2012\Council
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. Why is there a $190 /ton maximum in Resolution 80 -11? <br />- The Council had demanded that some figure be included, however, <br />current DEM Director was not involved with how the $190 figure was <br />chosen. Speculation is that the $190 /ton was to include cost increases <br />over the length of the contract. DEM stated that they do not recommend <br />including an amount in the resolution because the risk is if it is too low, it <br />will discourage competition and if the number is too high, it may result in <br />a higher bid. The State procurement laws and rules were established to <br />ensure competitive bidding and prices. <br />- While a specific figure might not be included in the resolution, DEM <br />should conduct an analysis in -house to obtain a cost effective objective <br />for future discussions. <br />4. Would it be better to prepare two RFPs IFB 's one for each zone? <br />- The last IFB included 2 zones (East & West Hawaii) and DEM plans for <br />two zones in the new IFB. As with most contracts, there is an "experience <br />factor" that must be considered, but nothing limits the County to only <br />one contractor. More than two `zones' could also be established, each <br />`zone' with a separate contract. However, it is important that each zone <br />include a high- volume transfer station site like Hilo or Kona to avoid <br />higher costs in the smaller, more rural sites. For example, under the <br />current contract, the bidder provides the same rate per ton to haul the <br />mixed recycle bins from Kona as they do for the bins from Keei. <br />- To expand competition, it would make some sense that, if a bidder <br />could meet basic criteria but is limited in servicing all of the transfer <br />stations within a zone, then an RFP could be prepared for more than <br />two zones. <br />5. Why do we maintain only a two -bin system? <br />- The two -bin system was developed from the 2002 ISWMP Plan Update <br />that recommended expanding the number and scope of its recycling <br />programs. The 2 -Bin recycling program was an integral part of the 2009 <br />IRSWMP Plan Update which includes the specific recommendation <br />"Expanding the availability and increasing the convenience of reuse and <br />recycling opportunities available to both residents and businesses ". <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.