My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0768.001 2010-2012
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2010-2012
>
COM 0768.001 2010-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2012 4:34:04 PM
Creation date
7/2/2012 10:30:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2010-2012
Communication
0768
Point
001
Author
BJ Leithhead-Todd, Planning Director
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
AGE PC 07/18/2012 2010-2012
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Agendas\2010-2012\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AU: Mr. Chairman? <br /> KERN: Commissioner Au. <br /> AU: In the event that this rezoning is approved with us and then the County Council, and then you go <br /> along and you do your, you guys have your place of business, and the neighbor builds a house, are you <br /> willing to accommodate them and put up some shrubs and trees, and maybe a fence? <br /> MELROSE: I think what we are willing to say at this point is that by, at an absolute minimum we will <br /> meet the landscape requirements. That those are, there is a requirement to landscape the size of a <br /> residential facility. I think that the Board of Realtors will, prior to them building a home, build some <br /> additional shrubbery around the back edge of the property. It's a very quiet edge of the property. So, <br /> you know, whether we go above and beyond what the Code requires, I don't know that I could commit <br /> that at the moment. But I think that the intention is to be a sound, to create a sound and visual barrier <br /> along the side, which is the intention of the Code. <br /> ONO: One more question, Chair. <br /> KERN: Commissioner Ono. <br /> ONO: The letter was referring to the loss of value of her property. And I am not a real estate person <br /> so I need to ask. When you develop a commercial property, doesn't that increase the value of the <br /> property or does it really lower the value of the neighboring property? <br /> MELROSE: You know, I think that's a relative circumstance. I think that if you bought it for a <br /> residential purpose, which is what this person said they had bought the property for, I don't, I mean I <br /> think if Burger King moved in next door that might have an impact on the value of the property. A <br /> quiet office is operating, you know, doesn't have students renting it and playing music loud at night -- <br /> and which is the other use that the building has been in for some period of time -- is actually, would be <br /> a substantially quieter use. And it is in an area where the high density in the General Plan prevails and <br /> that other properties along this have been moving into these kinds of commercial uses, the dialysis <br /> facility most recently I think. So, you know, I think they have what they have. I am not sure that the <br /> values change in this circumstance. <br /> KERN: Commissioner Ono? <br /> ONO: So in terms of the resident, that resident's property, would her property tax increase or decrease <br /> with the development of your property? I mean, I don't know—. <br /> KRAUS: Her property tax or her value? <br /> ONO: I beg your pardon? <br /> KRAUS: Her property tax or her value? <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.