My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COM 0555.009 2010-2012
ClerkCouncil
>
Council Records
>
Communications
>
2010-2012
>
COM 0555.009 2010-2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2021 12:11:43 PM
Creation date
10/1/2012 8:47:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Communications
Communications - Type
COM
Communications - Council Term
2010-2012
Communication
0555
Point
009
Author
Sam Cooper
Communications - Referred To
PC
Document Relationships
REP PC 064 09/05/2012 2010-2012
(Related)
Path:
\Council Records\Reports\2010-2012\Planning Committee (PC)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
County took steps to correct the issue. After the issue was corrected the <br /> lowest weep hole on the retaining wall was 2 ft under ground. <br /> 7. Issues A. Will your property values decrease? Studies say no. My <br /> response. Once again studies are being used that are broad in scope. My <br /> property value will greatly decrease and so will the properties located next <br /> door to the apartments. We would have to greatly lower our selling price <br /> to induce someone to buy a property next to an apartment building. B Do <br /> you want more students in your neighborhood? University increases <br /> students not building houses equals more traffic. Housing students in your <br /> neighborhood reduces car traffic. New property tax revenues may be used <br /> for traffic mitigation. My response. The existing and any future increase <br /> in traffic that commute to the University commute to the school cue <br /> on different routes not just on Rini()'1e Street. Traffic will be increased by <br /> the apartments since there al 34 parking spaces and <br /> the guests trafficking to and from the apartments so traffic will not be <br /> decreased. Traffic comes and goes and other than the morning and <br /> afternoon commutes there is not a lot of traffic on the street most of the <br /> time. Traffic from the apartments is 24 / 7 and will create noise, nuisance <br /> and public safety issues. Property taxes are put into the general fund and <br /> chances are slim that any would be used for traffic mitigation in our <br /> neighborhood. C. Development remains students only. Restrict the land to <br /> student housing. My response. First of all the apartments are subject to <br /> rental and housing laws so it is not student housing and anyone who <br /> qualifies can rent an apartment. The apartments will rent to students and <br /> their immediate family (dependent children, spouses and civil partners) <br /> which can result in 3 to 5 people living in each bedroom which can result <br /> in over 100 people living at the apartments. His proposed restriction is for <br /> 10 years which is a short period of time. After that we may be faced with <br /> a low income apartment complex. <br /> I did contact a Mr. Miles Nagata head of UH housing here in Hilo and a Mr. Brian <br /> Minaii from the Office of Capitol Improvements regarding the Winegar project <br /> and they had no knowledge of the project. Until) Tuesday as stated in today's <br /> paper the University had no knowledge of this project. -t�l- T i--� Z v ti c'4 s G G'4 <br /> '3GrG ���� Pl2C/5- (. 70 64 /5'v i;crvi C it</15,1_ 7744- - -1. /0 <br /> I feel a 25 % reduction in the size of the apartment is not enough as it will r- <br /> minimize all of the negative issues with this project by 25%. T r-r- <br /> �`z <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.